POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

North Carolina General Assembly permits electronic monitoring in nursing and adult care homes under the G.U.A.R.D. Act

Original title: Elec. Monitoring in Nursing/Adult Care Homes.

Last action · April 1, 2025: Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House (House action)Sponsors: David Willis and 8 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina House Bill 591 allows nursing home and adult care home residents to install and use electronic monitoring devices in their rooms at their own expense starting October 1, 2025. Facilities are prohibited from refusing admission or discharging residents over monitoring requests and must provide power sources and mounting space. Recordings from these devices are made admissible in civil and criminal court actions, and facility operators face misdemeanor penalties for violations or tampering.

Why it matters

Residents gain the legal right to record their private living spaces to ensure personal safety, while facility operators face criminal misdemeanor charges, fines up to $2,000, and up to a year of imprisonment for obstructing devices or retaliating against monitoring requests.

Background
  • The General Assembly of North Carolina is the state's bicameral legislature responsible for enacting statutory laws. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Nursing home and adult care home residents

Residents gain the legal right to install electronic monitoring devices in their rooms at their own expense and have their recordings admitted as evidence in court proceedings.

Directly affected

Nursing home and adult care home operators

Facility operators must accommodate monitoring requests, provide power sources and mounting space, refrain from retaliatory discharges or admission refusals, and face Class A1 misdemeanor penalties for violations or device tampering.

Key Facts

  • Residents of nursing homes, combination homes, and adult care homes are permitted to monitor their rooms using electronic monitoring devices at their own expense.
  • Residents or their legal representatives must post a conspicuous notice on the door of the room stating that an electronic monitoring device is in use.
  • Facilities are prohibited from refusing admission to an individual or discharging a current resident due to a request to install an electronic monitoring device.
  • Facilities must make reasonable physical accommodations, including providing access to power sources, internet if available, and a secure mounting place for devices.
Show all 9 facts
  • Facility contracts cannot include provisions that purport to waive or modify a resident's monitoring rights.
  • Recordings created by electronic monitoring devices are admissible in civil and criminal actions in North Carolina courts, subject to the rules of evidence.
  • Operating a facility in violation of the monitoring statute is a Class A1 misdemeanor punishable by a fine up to $2,000, imprisonment up to one year, or both.
  • Willfully tampering with, obstructing, or destroying an electronic monitoring device without consent is a Class A1 misdemeanor punishable by a fine up to $2,000, imprisonment up to 90 days, or both.
  • The act takes effect on October 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who pays for the installation and maintenance of the electronic monitoring device?
The resident is responsible for all costs associated with the installation, maintenance, and removal of the electronic monitoring device.
Can a nursing home refuse to admit someone because they want to use a camera in their room?
No. Facilities are expressly prohibited from refusing admission or discharging a resident due to a request to install an electronic monitoring device.
Are video or audio recordings from these devices admissible in court?
Yes, recordings created through a resident's electronic monitoring device are admissible in civil and criminal actions brought in North Carolina courts, subject to the rules of evidence.
What happens if someone deliberately destroys or tampers with a resident's monitoring device?
A person who willfully and without consent tampers with, obstructs, or destroys a device is guilty of a , subject to a fine up to $2,000, imprisonment up to 90 days, or both.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Apr 1, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  2. Apr 1, 2025House
    Withdrawn From Com
  3. Apr 1, 2025House
    Serial Referral To Judiciary 2 Stricken
  4. Apr 1, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Health, if favorable, Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  5. Apr 1, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  6. Mar 31, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Establishment of Statutory Surveillance Rights in Care Facilities

The G.U.A.R.D. Act shifts North Carolina law to explicitly guarantee residents the right to install private surveillance devices and makes those recordings admissible in judicial proceedings while penalizing facility obstruction.

Connected Entities

Bill Ward, Diane Wheatley, Jeff McNeely and 6 more
PersonBill Ward“Cosponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonDiane Wheatley“Cosponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonJeff McNeely“Cosponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonDavid Willis“Primary sponsor of House Bill 591 in the North Carolina General Assembly.”Map →
PersonBen Moss“Cosponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonMark Brody“Sponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonJake Johnson“Cosponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonDonnie Loftis“Sponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →
PersonNasif Majeed“Cosponsor of House Bill 591.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz50
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record