POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Michigan expands authorized marriage officiants to civil celebrants and raises violation penalties

Original title: Family law: marriage and divorce; civil celebrant; provide for.

Last action · June 10, 2025: referred to Committee on Government OperationsSponsors: Veronica Klinefelt and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Michigan Senate Bill 286 updates marriage licensing and solemnization laws to explicitly include s alongside clergymen and magistrates, while increasing the fine for officiating an unlicensed marriage to $500.00.

Why it matters

Couples choosing a rather than a traditional clergy member or magistrate gain explicit legal recognition for their wedding officiant, and officiants face stiffer financial penalties and charges for failing to verify marriage licenses or return certificates on time.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Marriage officiants

Officiants face updated certificate completion rules, a 10-day return window, and increased misdemeanor fines of $500.00 for performing ceremonies without a valid license.

Directly affected

Couples marrying in Michigan

Couples must ensure their chosen officiant is authorized under the statute and that their marriage license is delivered prior to the ceremony.

Directly affected

County clerks

County clerks issue marriage licenses to residents and non-residents and receive the returned original marriage certificates from officiants.

Key Facts

  • The bill amends sections 1, 4, and 6 of 1887 PA 128 to update marriage licensing and officiant rules.
  • Parties intending to be married must obtain a marriage license from the county clerk and deliver it to the person officiating the marriage before it can be performed.
  • If both parties are non-residents of Michigan, 1 party must obtain the license from the county clerk of the county where the marriage is to be performed.
  • Persons officiating a marriage must fill in certificate spaces for the time, place, 2 witness signatures, and their own name, title, address, and signature.
Show all 8 facts
  • Officiants must separate the duplicate license and certificate, deliver the duplicate half to one of the married parties, and return the original to the county clerk within 10 days.
  • Officiants must keep an accurate record of all marriages solemnized in a book used expressly for that purpose.
  • An officiant who joins parties without a properly issued license or violates the act is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $500.00 or imprisonment in the county jail for 90 days.
  • The amendatory act does not take effect unless Senate Bill No. 285 of the 103rd Legislature is enacted into law.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if an officiant performs a wedding without a properly issued marriage license?
The officiant is guilty of a and faces a fine of $500.00 or up to 90 days in the county jail in default of payment.
How long does an officiant have to return the original marriage certificate to the county clerk?
The officiant must return the original certificate to the county clerk within 10 days.
Where must non-resident couples obtain their marriage license?
If both parties are non-residents of Michigan, they must obtain the license from the county clerk of the county in which the marriage is to be performed.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

13 actions
  1. Jun 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Government Operations
  2. Jun 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  3. Jun 10, 2025House
    received on 06/10/2025
  4. Jun 10, 2025SenateFloor
    PASSED ROLL CALL # 163 YEAS 22 NAYS 15 EXCUSED 0 NOT VOTING 0
  5. Jun 5, 2025Senate
    PLACED ON ORDER OF THIRD READING
  6. Jun 5, 2025Senate
    REPORTED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT(S)
Show 7 earlier actions
  1. Jun 4, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
  2. Jun 4, 2025SenateCommittee
    REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 6/3/2025
  3. May 20, 2025Senate
    SENATE CO-SPONSOR(S) NAMED: SEAN MCCANN
  4. May 8, 2025Senate
    SENATE CO-SPONSOR(S) NAMED: MALLORY MCMORROW
  5. May 8, 2025Senate
    SENATE CO-SPONSOR(S) NAMED: ERIKA GEISS
  6. May 7, 2025SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
  7. May 7, 2025SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR VERONICA KLINEFELT

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference99% confidence

Conditional Legislative Enactment

Senate Bill 286 explicitly relies on the passage of companion Senate Bill 285 to take effect, linking civil celebrant provisions directly to separate statutory updates.

Connected Entities

Veronica Klinefelt, Erika Geiss, 1887 PA 128 and 2 more
PersonVeronica Klinefelt“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 286”Map →
PersonErika Geiss“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 286”Map →
other1887 PA 128“Act being amended by this bill”Map →
PersonMallory McMorrow“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 286”Map →
PersonSean McCann“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 286”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record