The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas HB 188 authorizes counties to regulate impervious cover in unincorporated areas to manage flood risks
Last action · July 23, 2025: FiledSponsor: Erin Zwiener
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
County s in Texas are authorized to regulate in s to reduce flood risks, promote drainage, and support flood projects starting 91 days after the legislative session ends.
Landowners and developers in unincorporated county areas face potential new local restrictions on hard surfaces like concrete and roofs to control stormwater runoff.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
unincorporated area landowners
Property owners in unincorporated areas are subject to new county regulations limiting impervious cover.
county governments
County commissioners courts gain new legal authority to regulate impervious cover and establish flood mitigation rules.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which areas of a county are affected by this bill?
What reasons can a county use to justify regulating impervious cover?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Jul 23, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
