The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Georgia House Bill 90 doubles maximum acreage for conservation use property tax assessment
Last action · May 9, 2025: House Date Signed by GovernorSponsors: Chuck Efstration and 4 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
Georgia House Bill 90 raises the maximum acreage limit to qualify for preferential property tax assessment as from 2,000 acres to 4,000 acres, starting January 1, 2027, contingent on voter ratification of a constitutional amendment in November 2026.
Property owners and family-owned farm entities holding large tracts of agricultural, timber, or environmentally sensitive land can receive preferential tax assessments on up to 4,000 acres instead of the previous 2,000-acre cap.
- Bona fide conservation use property in Georgia benefits from preferential property tax assessments to encourage the preservation of agricultural land, timberland, and environmentally sensitive areas. context
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Property owners
Property owners can qualify for preferential conservation use tax assessments on up to 4,000 acres instead of the previous 2,000-acre limit.
Family-owned farm entities
Members of family-owned farm entities may allocate unused portions of their individual acreage limits toward the entity's total acreage up to the new 4,000-acre cap.
Key Facts
- Increases the maximum acreage limit for a single person's bona fide conservation use property from 2,000 acres to 4,000 acres.
- Allows family-owned farm entities to allocate unused portions of individual members' acreage limitations up to a new 4,000-acre threshold.
- Raises the acreage limit for environmentally sensitive property certified by the Department of Natural Resources from 2,000 acres to 4,000 acres.
- Prohibits any taxpayer from receiving current use assessment benefits on more than 4,000 acres in any tax year.
Show all 7 facts
- Authorizes single owners to enter into multiple covenants for conservation use property up to an aggregate total of 4,000 acres.
- Requires the state commissioner to maintain a central registry of conservation use property to ensure compliance with the 4,000-acre statewide limit.
- Sets an effective date of January 1, 2027, conditional upon voter approval of a constitutional amendment at the November 2026 statewide general election.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does House Bill 90 change regarding property taxes?
When will these changes take effect?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: Signed into law.
Procedural history
16 actions- Jan 1, 2027Georgia General AssemblyEffective Date
- May 9, 2025HouseEnrolledHouse Date Signed by Governor
- May 9, 2025GovernorEnrolledAct 78
- Apr 7, 2025HouseHouse Sent to Governor
- Mar 18, 2025SenateSenate Engrossed
- Mar 18, 2025SenateSenate Third Read
Show 10 earlier actions
- Mar 18, 2025SenateFloorSenate Passed/Adopted
- Mar 13, 2025SenateSenate Read Second Time
- Mar 11, 2025SenateCommitteeSenate Committee Favorably Reported
- Feb 21, 2025SenateIntroducedSenate Read and Referred
- Feb 20, 2025HouseHouse Third Readers
- Feb 20, 2025HouseFloorHouse Passed/Adopted
- Feb 12, 2025HouseCommitteeHouse Committee Favorably Reported
- Jan 27, 2025HouseHouse Second Readers
- Jan 17, 2025HouseIntroducedHouse First Readers
- Jan 16, 2025HouseIntroducedHouse Hopper
Version history & redline
3 versions on fileOfficial version history is partial: 1 linked text is unavailable or incomplete. Source links remain available below.
Voting Record
MOTION TO ENGROSS: HB 90, HB 223, HR 32
Total
51
- Yes
- 28
- No
- 20
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 3
How they voted (51)
27 more members
Show 2 earlier roll calls
PASSAGE
Total
51
- Yes
- 45
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 4
How they voted (51)
27 more members
PASSAGE
Total
174
- Yes
- 107
- No
- 61
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 5
How they voted (174)
150 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.ga.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
