New Ethics Rules for Public Officials and Employees
November 18, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Chapter No. 2026-22. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Introduced.
Procedural history
21 actions- Feb 11, 2026HouseIn Messages
- Feb 11, 2026SenateImmediately certified
- Feb 11, 2026SenateFloorCS passed as amended; YEAS 38 NAYS 0
- Feb 11, 2026SenateFloorRead 3rd time
- Feb 11, 2026SenateAmendment(s) adopted (807008)
- Feb 11, 2026SenateFloorRead 2nd time
Show 15 earlier actions
- Feb 9, 2026SenatePlaced on Special Order Calendar, 02/11/26
- Feb 3, 2026SenatePlaced on Calendar, on 2nd reading
- Feb 3, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by- Rules; YEAS 23 NAYS 0
- Jan 29, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/03/26, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
- Jan 29, 2026SenateCS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time
- Jan 28, 2026SenateNow in Rules
- Jan 27, 2026SenatePending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
- Jan 26, 2026SenateCS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
- Jan 21, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 01/26/26, 3:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
- Jan 14, 2026SenateNow in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
- Jan 13, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced
- Jan 13, 2026SenateCommitteeFavorable by Ethics and Elections; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
- Jan 8, 2026SenateOn Committee agenda-- Ethics and Elections, 01/13/26, 4:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
- Dec 9, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Ethics and Elections; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
- Nov 18, 2025SenateIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The law changes who is considered a '' for conflict-of-interest and anti-nepotism rules, directly affecting hiring and appointment practices for public boards, school districts, and state-affiliated organizations.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Public officers and employees
Must comply with updated definitions of 'relative' and new disclosure requirements.
Greater Miami Expressway Agency personnel
Subject to new lobbying restrictions, conflict-of-interest disclosures, and post-employment rules.
District school board members
Prohibited from appointing relatives to positions under their direct supervision and restricted on gift acceptance.
Last recorded activity November 18, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this law allow me to hire my relative for a government job?
Are foster family members now considered relatives under ethics laws?
What are the gift limits for school board members?
Why It Matters
The law changes who is considered a '' for conflict-of-interest and anti-nepotism rules, directly affecting hiring and appointment practices for public boards, school districts, and state-affiliated organizations.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
44
Yes
42
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (44)
Joe Gruters
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · absent
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Keith Truenow
Republican · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
+ 20 more
Favorable
Total
28
Yes
27
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (28)
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · other
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
+ 4 more
Favorable with Committee Substitute
Total
9
Yes
9
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Favorable
Total
8
Yes
8
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Anti-Nepotism Definitions
The law explicitly incorporates foster family relationships into the state's ethics framework, closing a gap in the previous definition of 'relative'.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools