POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

North Dakota Legislative Assembly Considers Resolution on State-Funded Essential Services Amid Federal Funding Shifts

Original title: A concurrent resolution affirming the 69th Legislative Assembly's commitment to ensuring state-funded essential services remain fully funded and operational regardless of changes in federal funding allocations.

Last action · February 20, 2025: Second reading, failed to adopt yeas 43 nays 44Sponsors: Jayme Davis and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

A was introduced in the North Dakota Legislative Assembly to affirm the state's commitment to keeping essential services fully funded regardless of federal funding changes, though the measure ultimately failed in the House.

Why it matters

Establishes a non-binding legislative stance on state budgetary priorities and self-reliance in response to potential federal funding fluctuations affecting public programs.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

North Dakota citizens

Rely on essential services provided and maintained by state government operations.

Directly affected

farmers and ranchers

Rely on agricultural programs and rural community support identified in state essential services.

Directly affected

tribal nations

Engaged through continued collaboration for shared governance and economic stability.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this resolution propose to do?
It affirms the Legislative Assembly's commitment to maintaining state-funded essential services like education and law enforcement regardless of federal funding changes, and urges state officials to assess federal funding risks.
Does this resolution appropriate any money?
No, it is a expressing legislative intent and policy stance rather than an appropriations bill.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This resolution did not become law - Failed in the House.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Feb 20, 2025House
    Second reading, failed to adopt yeas 43 nays 44
  2. Feb 17, 2025HouseCommittee
    Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
  3. Feb 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 9 0 4
  4. Feb 13, 2025HouseCommittee
    Committee Hearing 02:30
  5. Jan 30, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

House of Representatives, Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly, Secretary of State and 2 more
OrganizationHouse of Representatives“Chamber of the North Dakota Legislative Assembly”Map →
OrganizationSixty-ninth Legislative Assembly“Legislative body of North Dakota”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of State“State office responsible for forwarding copies of the resolution”Map →
PersonGovernor of North Dakota“State executive official”Map →
OrganizationNorth Dakota Congressional Delegation“Federal congressional representatives for North Dakota”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 25)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record