POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Mississippi Bill Restricts State Incentives for Employers Replacing U.S. Citizens with H-1B Visa Workers

Original title: Mississippi Employment Protection Act; amend to restrict incentives for employers who use H-1B visa labor over US citizens.

Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Michael McLendon

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 71-11-3, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO ALLOW THE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE TAX COMMISSION, SECRETARY OF STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, TO PROMULGATE RULES AND REGULATIONS RESTRICTING STATE INCENTIVES FOR EMPLOYERS WHO USE H-1B VISA LABOR OVER THE LABOR OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS; TO DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF INCENTIVES TO BE EVALUATED IN SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

Why it matters

Employers in Mississippi utilizing holders instead of domestic workers face potential loss of state-provided economic incentives like tax credits and rebates, altering the calculation for businesses employing foreign specialized workers.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employers in Mississippi

Employers who utilize H-1B visa labor face potential restriction or loss of state economic incentives such as tax credits and property tax exemptions.

Directly affected

H-1B visa holders

Foreign workers on H-1B visas may be affected indirectly through shifts in employer hiring practices influenced by state incentive restrictions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which state agencies are responsible for restricting incentives under this bill?
The Department of Employment Security, in conjunction with the State Tax Commission, Secretary of State, Department of Human Services, and the Attorney General.
What types of state incentives are targeted by the restrictions?
Tax credits, rebates, and property tax exemptions, among others.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    02/03 (S) Died In Committee
  2. Jan 14, 2026SenateCommittee
    01/14 (S) Referred To Labor;Finance

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

State Tax Commission, Attorney General, Department of Human Services and 3 more
OrganizationState Tax Commission“Collaborates on rules and regulations restricting state incentives.”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Collaborates on rules and regulations restricting state incentives.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Human Services“Collaborates on rules and regulations restricting state incentives.”Map →
OrganizationMississippi Department of Employment Security“Authorized to promulgate rules and hold enforcement authority under the Mississi”Map →
PersonMichael McLendon“Senate sponsor of Senate Bill 2255.”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of State“Collaborates on rules and regulations restricting state incentives.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record