POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Louisiana appropriates $17,000 to pay consent judgment in Flowers lawsuit

Original title: APPROPRIATIONS/JUDGMENT: Appropriates funds for payment of the consent judgment against the state in the suit entitled Anna Flowers and Brent Flowers v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development et als.

Last action · March 9, 2026: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Appropriations.Sponsor: Christopher Turner

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Louisiana sets aside $17,000 from the State General Fund for 2025-2026 to pay a in the lawsuit involving Anna and Brent Flowers against the Department of Transportation and Development.

Why it matters

Allocates state funds to fulfill a specific court-ordered settlement from the Eleventh Judicial District in Sabine Parish.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Anna Flowers and Brent Flowers

They are slated to receive the $17,000 payment to satisfy the consent judgment from their lawsuit.

Directly affected

Department of Transportation and Development

The department is named as a party in the lawsuit against the state.

Key Facts

  • Appropriates the sum of $17,000 from the State General Fund (Direct) for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.
  • Funds are designated for payment of a consent judgment in the suit Anna Flowers & Brent Flowers versus State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation & Development et als.
  • The lawsuit bears number 63,977 on the docket of the Eleventh Judicial District in Sabine Parish.
  • The consent judgment was signed on April 1, 2016.
Show all 8 facts
  • Payment covers principal, interest, court costs, and expert witness fees as awarded in the judgment.
  • If the provisions of the judgment conflict with this Act, the judgment provisions are controlling.
  • Payment requires the presentation of required documentation to the state treasurer.
  • The judgment is deemed paid on the effective date of the Act, and interest ceases to run as of that date.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who receives the funds appropriated by this bill?
The funds are appropriated for the payment of the to Anna Flowers and Brent Flowers.
What happens to the interest on the judgment once the bill becomes effective?
The judgment is deemed paid on the effective date of the Act, and interest ceases to run as of that date.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
  2. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  3. Feb 26, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  4. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

State General Fund, Sabine, Department of Transportation and Development and 4 more
OrganizationState General Fund“Source of the appropriation”Map →
locationSabine“Parish where the lawsuit was filed”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Transportation and Development“State department party to the suit”Map →
OrganizationState of Louisiana“Defendant in the lawsuit”Map →
PersonBrent Flowers“Plaintiff in the lawsuit against the state”Map →
PersonAnna Flowers“Plaintiff in the lawsuit against the state”Map →
locationEleventh Judicial District“Judicial district court for Sabine Parish”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance15
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 15)
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment2
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record