POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofLabor →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut bill expands workplace lactation breaks, includes security screenings as paid hours, and forms heat safety task force

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING BREASTFEEDING IN THE WORKPLACE, PRE AND POST-SHIFT HOURS AND ESTABLISHING A TASK FORCE TO STUDY WORKPLACE HEAT SAFETY STANDARDS.

Last action · April 2, 2026: File Number 351Sponsors: Martin Looney and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Employers must provide employees with reasonable break time to express breast milk or breastfeed on site whenever the need arises, starting October 1, 2026. The legislation also explicitly includes mandatory employer-required security screenings in the legal definition of paid '' and establishes a task force to study workplace heat safety standards.

Why it matters

Employees gain the right to take lactation breaks outside of scheduled meal periods and receive legal guarantees that time spent on mandatory security checks counts as paid work time. Employers must accommodate nursing employees and adhere to new state-level review of heat safety practices.

Background
  • The Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that employees must be compensated for time spent in mandatory security screenings on their employer's premises. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employers

Employers must accommodate unscheduled lactation breaks, include mandatory security screening time as paid hours, and potentially adjust workplace policies.

Directly affected

Nursing employees

Nursing employees gain the right to take paid or unpaid break time to express milk whenever needed, supported by private accommodation requirements.

Directly affected

Workers subject to security screenings

Employees required to undergo employer security screenings have that time legally classified as paid hours worked.

Key Facts

  • Employers of any size must provide reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk or breastfeed on site each time the employee has the need.
  • Employers must make reasonable efforts to provide a private, non-toilet room near the work area equipped with a refrigerator or cold storage device and electrical outlet.
  • Employers are prohibited from discriminating against, disciplining, or taking adverse employment action against any employee exercising lactation rights.
  • The definition of 'hours worked' under state statute is expanded to include time an employee spends in security screenings required by an employer.
Show all 8 facts
  • A workplace heat safety task force is established to examine best practices for preventing heat illness and review laws from other states.
  • The heat safety task force must submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the Labor and Public Employees Committee by January 1, 2027, and terminate thereafter.
  • Initial appointments to the heat safety task force must be made within 30 days of the section's passage, and its first meeting must occur within 60 days.
  • The Department of Labor may assess a civil penalty of $300 for violations of workplace breastfeeding regulations.

Frequently Asked Questions

When can employees take lactation breaks under the bill?
Employers must provide reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk or breastfeed on site each time the employee has the need, rather than being restricted to scheduled meal or break periods.
Are security screenings considered paid working time?
Yes. The bill modifies the definition of '' to explicitly include all time an employee spends in employer-required security screenings.
What is the purpose of the newly established task force?
The task force is established to study and provide recommendations on the establishment of heat safety standards for workplaces, including best practices to prevent heat illness and an examination of other states' laws.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 351
  2. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 237
  3. Apr 2, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26 5:00 PM
  6. Mar 18, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  2. Feb 27, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/03
  3. Feb 26, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Labor and Public Employees

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Alignment with Federal Standards

The bill updates state breastfeeding provisions to align with broader federal protections requiring flexible break times for nursing employees.

Connected Entities

Aimee Berger-Girvalo, Martin M. Looney, Maryam Khan and 3 more
PersonAimee Berger-Girvalo“House co-sponsor”Map →
PersonMartin M. Looney“Senate co-sponsor”Map →
PersonMaryam Khan“House co-sponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Labor“State labor agency responsible for enforcement and penalties”Map →
OrganizationLabor and Public Employees Committee“Legislative committee reporting the bill”Map →
PersonNick Gauthier“House co-sponsor”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record