POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Idaho repeals Capital Crimes Defense Fund statute and removes obsolete public defender language

Original title: STATE APPELLATE PUBLIC DEFENDERS – Repeals existing law to remove obsolete language relating to the Capital Crimes Defense Fund.

Last action · March 12, 2026: Signed by Governor on 03/11/26 Session Law Chapter 14 Effective: 07/01/2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Idaho s Section 19-5908 of the Idaho Code to eliminate the Capital Crimes Defense Fund and remove obsolete statutory language regarding state appellate public defenders, effective July 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Removes an inactive statutory funding mechanism from state law as part of a legislative code cleanup effort, affecting how state public defense statutes are organized without altering active operational funding.

Background
  • The Idaho Code Cleanup Act is a legislative mechanism used to review and eliminate obsolete, outdated, or unnecessary statutes from state law. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Appellate Public Defenders

Statutory language governing obsolete funds related to their agency is removed from the Idaho Code.

Key Facts

  • Repeals Section 19-5908 of the Idaho Code, which authorized the Capital Crimes Defense Fund.
  • Declares legislative intent to streamline state laws and remove obsolete, outdated, or unnecessary provisions under the Idaho Code Cleanup Act.
  • Sets an effective date of July 1, 2026, supported by a declared emergency.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Bill 1248 do?
It s Section 19-5908 of the Idaho Code, removing obsolete statutory language relating to the Capital Crimes Defense Fund.
When does this change take effect?
The act takes effect on July 1, 2026.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

19 actions
  1. Mar 12, 2026Enrolled
    Signed by Governor on 03/11/26 Session Law Chapter 14 Effective: 07/01/2026
  2. Mar 10, 2026
    Reported delivered to Governor at 2 p.m. on 03/10/26
  3. Mar 10, 2026
    Reported signed by the Speaker & ordered delivered to Governor
  4. Mar 9, 2026
    Received from Senate; Signed by Speaker; Returned to Senate
  5. Mar 9, 2026
    Reported enrolled; signed by President; to House for signature of Speaker
  6. Mar 6, 2026Committee
    Returned From House Passed; referred to enrolling
Show 13 earlier actions
  1. Mar 5, 2026Floor
    Read Third Time in Full – PASSED - 68-0-2 AYES – Alfieri, Barbieri, Beiswenger, Berch, Bingham, Boyle, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Cayler, Cheatum, Church, Cornilles, Crane(12), Crane(13), Dygert, Egbert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Erickson, Fuhriman, Furniss, Galaviz, Gannon, Garner, Hall(Stone), Handy, Harris, Hawkins, Haws, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Hostetler, Leavitt, Manwaring, Marmon, Mathias, McCann, Mendive, Mickelsen(Athay), Miller, Mitchell, Monks, Nelsen, Palmer, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Price, Rasor, Raybould, Redman, Rubel, Sauter, Scott, Shepherd, Shirts, Skaug, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Vander Woude, Veile, Weber, Wheeler, Wisniewski, Mr. Speaker NAYS – None Absent – Green, Raymond Floor Sponsor - Scott Title apvd - to Senate
  2. Mar 4, 2026
    U.C. to hold place on third reading calendar one legislative day
  3. Mar 3, 2026
    U.C. to hold place on third reading calendar one legislative day
  4. Mar 2, 2026
    U.C. to hold place on third reading calendar one legislative day
  5. Feb 27, 2026
    Read second time; Filed for Third Reading
  6. Feb 26, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading
  7. Feb 16, 2026Introduced
    Read First Time, Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration
  8. Feb 16, 2026
    Received from the Senate, Filed for First Reading
  9. Feb 13, 2026Floor
    Read third time in full – PASSED - 32-0-3 AYES – Adams, Anthon, Bernt, Bjerke, Bjerke(Keyser), Blaylock, Burtenshaw, Carlson, Cook, Den Hartog, Foreman, Galloway, Grow, Guthrie, Harris, Hart, Kohl, Lakey, Lenney, Lent, Nichols, Rabe, Ricks, Ruchti, Semmelroth, Shippy, Taylor, VanOrden, Wintrow, Woodward, Zito, Zuiderveld NAYS – None Absent and excused – Okuniewicz, Toews, Ward-Engelking Floor Sponsor - Lakey Title apvd - to House
  10. Feb 11, 2026
    Read second time; filed for Third Reading
  11. Feb 10, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation; Filed for second reading
  12. Feb 4, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed; referred to Judiciary & Rules
  13. Feb 3, 2026Introduced
    Introduced; read first time; referred to JR for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Idaho Code Cleanup Act, Judiciary and Rules Committee, State Appellate Public Defenders and 1 more
otherIdaho Code Cleanup Act“Statutory framework guiding the removal of obsolete laws.”Map →
OrganizationJudiciary and Rules Committee“Committee that introduced Senate Bill 1248.”Map →
OrganizationState Appellate Public Defenders“State agency affected by the repeal of obsolete code language.”Map →
otherCapital Crimes Defense Fund“Fund authorized under the repealed Section 19-5908.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance30
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy0
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record