The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.West Virginia Bill Requires Businesses to File Federal Merger Notifications With the Attorney General
Last action · January 14, 2026: To JudiciarySponsor: Mike Oliverio
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Certain businesses merging or engaging in transactions above federal size thresholds must now contemporaneously file copies of their federal merger notifications and related documents with the West Virginia Attorney General, effective upon enactment for future filings.
Changes antitrust oversight by giving the state attorney general direct access to corporate merger filings for businesses based in the state or meeting sales thresholds, backed by civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day for noncompliance.
- State attorneys general traditionally rely on federal agencies or voluntary notifications to review large corporate mergers for potential anticompetitive effects within their jurisdictions. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Merging Businesses
Must submit electronic copies of federal pre-merger notifications and supporting documents to the state Attorney General if thresholds are met, under penalty of fines for noncompliance.
Attorney General
Receives merger filings, enforces compliance, maintains document confidentiality, and is authorized to share information with federal and reciprocal state authorities.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which businesses must file merger notifications with the West Virginia Attorney General?
What is the penalty for failing to file these merger documents with the state?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
4 actions- Jan 14, 2026SenateCommitteeTo Judiciary
- Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced in Senate
- Jan 14, 2026SenateCommitteeTo Judiciary
- Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroducedFiled for introduction
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
State-Level Antitrust Review Alignment
Adopts uniform model legislation to bridge state oversight with federal Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust merger reviews.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.wvlegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools