POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah alters federal grant approval tiers, adds high-dollar legislative oversight committees

Original title: Federal Grant Process Amendments

Last action · March 18, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Val Peterson and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Utah raises the funding thresholds for executive, judicial, and educational agency approval of federal grants and establishes mandatory legislative oversight committees for ultra-high-impact federal funds exceeding $100 million. Under the updated rules, medium and high impact grant tiers shift upward, requiring more rigorous review for large federal funding streams. The law takes effect on May 6, 2026, or earlier depending on legislative approval votes.

Why it matters

State agencies seeking large federal grants must now navigate stricter monetary thresholds and mandatory legislative committees before funds can be expended or obligated.

Background
  • The Executive Appropriations Committee is a key joint committee of the Utah Legislature responsible for managing the state's budget and reviewing fiscal matters. context
  • Utah code chapter 63J-5 governs how state agencies apply for, accept, and administer federal grants and funds. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

executive branch agencies

Executive agencies must adhere to adjusted dollar thresholds and submit required federal grant summaries to the governor and legislative committees.

Directly affected

judicial branch agencies

Judicial agencies must submit federal funds request summaries to the Judicial Council under updated monetary thresholds.

Directly affected

State Board of Education

The State Board of Education must review grant request summaries based on revised funding limits.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies a federal grant as an ultra-high-impact request?
An ultra-high-impact federal funds request is a new federal grant that will or could result in the state receiving total payments of $100,000,000 or more per year from the federal government.
Who must approve a medium-impact federal funds request before the state is obligated?
An agency must submit the request to the governor, Judicial Council, or State Board of Education for approval, and then to the Legislative Executive Appropriations Committee for review and recommendations.
When does this legislation take effect?
The bill takes effect on May 6, 2026, or earlier if approved by two-thirds of all members elected to each house.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

40 actions
  1. Mar 18, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ to Governor
  3. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 2, 2026Clerk of the House
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Feb 27, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 34 earlier actions
  1. Feb 27, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from House for Enrolling
  2. Feb 27, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
  3. Feb 27, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  4. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  5. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
  6. Feb 26, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  8. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  9. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  10. Feb 25, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  11. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  12. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  13. Feb 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  14. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  15. Feb 17, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  16. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  17. Feb 10, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  18. Feb 9, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  19. Feb 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  20. Feb 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  21. Feb 6, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  22. Feb 6, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  23. Jan 29, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  24. Jan 29, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  25. Jan 28, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  26. Jan 26, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  27. Jan 26, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0342
  28. Jan 25, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0342
  29. Jan 23, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  30. Jan 23, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  31. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0342
  32. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0342
  33. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  34. Jan 23, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Escalation of Federal Grant Review Thresholds

The legislation consistently shifts review thresholds upward (e.g., raising low-impact ceilings from $1 million to $5 million), adapting state oversight to larger federal award sizes.

Connected Entities

Judicial Council, State Board of Education, Executive Appropriations Committee and 5 more
OrganizationJudicial Council“Approves or rejects judicial branch federal funds requests”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Education“Reviews and approves state education federal funds requests”Map →
OrganizationExecutive Appropriations Committee“Legislative committee tasked with reviewing federal funds requests”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Legislative Research and General Counsel“Receives federal funds request summaries”Map →
OrganizationGovernor's Office of Planning and Budget“Receives federal funds request summaries and reports”Map →
PersonVal L. Peterson“Chief Sponsor of HB 342”Map →
PersonJerry W Stevenson“Senate Sponsor of HB 342”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst“Provides staff support and receives reports”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record