The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.New York authorizes Christopher Walser and Matthew Patire to take police civil service exam
Last action · September 25, 2026: SIGNED CHAP.298Sponsors: John Lemondes and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
New York enacted a law allowing Christopher Walser and Matthew Patire to take the competitive and be placed on the for full-time police officer positions in the village of Skaneateles, bypassing standard age and statutory limits under section 58 of the civil service law.
The measure creates a specific statutory exemption for two named individuals to qualify for municipal police employment in Skaneateles despite existing civil service restrictions.
- State legislatures occasionally pass special legislation to permit specific candidates to qualify for civil service exams when they exceed standard age limits or other statutory requirements. context
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Christopher Walser
Gains statutory eligibility to take the police civil service examination and be placed on the eligible list for the village of Skaneateles police department.
Matthew Patire
Gains statutory eligibility to take the police civil service examination and be placed on the eligible list for the village of Skaneateles police department.
village of Skaneateles police department
May consider Christopher Walser and Matthew Patire for full-time police officer appointment based on their examination scores.
Key Facts
- Christopher Walser and Matthew Patire are explicitly authorized to take the competitive civil service examination for the position of police officer.
- The individuals are eligible to be placed on the eligible list for appointment as full-time police officers for the village of Skaneateles police department, contingent on their exam scores.
- The authorization applies notwithstanding section 58 of the civil service law, including standard age requirements under paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of that section.
- Both individuals remain otherwise subject to the merit and fitness provisions of the civil service law applicable to full-time police officers.
Show all 5 facts
- The act takes effect immediately.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does this law apply to?
Does this exempt the individuals from all civil service requirements?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: Signed into law.
Procedural history
19 actions- Sep 25, 2026HouseEnrolledSIGNED CHAP.298
- Sep 22, 2026HouseEnrolledDELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
- Jun 4, 2026SenateRETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 4, 2026SenateFloorPASSED SENATE
- Jun 4, 2026SenateHOME RULE REQUEST
- Jun 4, 2026Senate3RD READING CAL.1790
Show 13 earlier actions
- Jun 4, 2026SenateSUBSTITUTED FOR S1232A
- Jun 2, 2026SenateCommitteeREFERRED TO RULES
- Jun 2, 2026HouseDELIVERED TO SENATE
- Jun 2, 2026HouseFloorPASSED ASSEMBLY
- Jun 2, 2026HouseHOME RULE REQUEST
- Jun 2, 2026HouseORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.340
- Jun 2, 2026HouseRULES REPORT CAL.340
- Jun 2, 2026HouseREPORTED
- May 28, 2026HouseCommitteeREPORTED REFERRED TO RULES
- Mar 25, 2026HousePRINT NUMBER 6148A
- Mar 25, 2026HouseCommitteeAMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES
- Jan 7, 2026HouseCommitteeREFERRED TO GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES
- Feb 26, 2025HouseCommitteeREFERRED TO GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Senate floor vote
Total
63
- Yes
- 59
- No
- 1
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 1
- Abstain
- 0
- Other positions
- 2
How they voted (63)
39 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.nysenate.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance15How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
