The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas designates a portion of State Highway 242 in Montgomery County as the Lance Corporal Armando Hernandez Memorial Bridge
Last action · June 20, 2025: Effective on 9/1/25Sponsors: Janis Holt and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Does
The state designates the bridge structure on State Highway 242 passing over Interstate Highway 69 in Montgomery County as the Lance Corporal Armando Hernandez Memorial Bridge, effective September 1, 2025.
Changes only the official honorary designation of a specific highway bridge and requires the state transportation agency to erect commemorative markers; no funding or service changes are stated.
Who It Affects
Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Texas Department of Transportation
The department is required to design, construct, and erect markers indicating the new bridge designation.
Motorists traveling on State Highway 242
Drivers will see the new memorial bridge markers erected at each end of the highway and at intermediate sites.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which specific bridge is being renamed?
Who is responsible for putting up the new signs?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Current status: Signed into law.
Procedural history
56 actions- Jun 20, 2025Governor of TexasEnrolledEffective on 9/1/25
- Jun 20, 2025Governor of TexasEnrolledSigned by the Governor
- May 28, 2025Governor of TexasEnrolledSent to the Governor
- May 27, 2025SenateSigned in the Senate
- May 27, 2025HouseSigned in the House
- May 26, 2025HouseReported enrolled
Show 50 earlier actions
- May 25, 2025HouseSenate passage reported
- May 25, 2025SenateFloorRecord vote
- May 25, 2025SenateFloorPassed
- May 25, 2025SenateFloorRead 3rd time
- May 25, 2025SenateFloorRecord vote
- May 25, 2025SenateThree day rule suspended
- May 25, 2025SenateVote recorded in Journal
- May 25, 2025SenateFloorRead 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
- May 25, 2025SenateLaid before the Senate
- May 25, 2025SenatePlaced on local & uncontested calendar
- May 14, 2025SenateCommittee report printed and distributed
- May 14, 2025SenateRecommended for local & uncontested calendar
- May 14, 2025SenateCommitteeReported favorably w/o amendments
- May 14, 2025SenateVote taken in committee
- May 14, 2025SenateTestimony taken in committee
- May 14, 2025SenateConsidered in public hearing
- May 14, 2025SenateScheduled for public hearing on . . .
- May 5, 2025SenateCommitteeReferred to Transportation
- May 5, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time
- Apr 30, 2025SenateReceived from the House
- Apr 30, 2025HouseReported engrossed
- Apr 30, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 30, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#1035)
- Apr 30, 2025HouseFloorPassed
- Apr 30, 2025HouseFloorRead 3rd time
- Apr 29, 2025HouseStatement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorRecord vote (RV#892)
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorPassed to engrossment
- Apr 29, 2025HouseFloorRead 2nd time
- Apr 29, 2025HousePlaced on General State Calendar
- Apr 25, 2025HouseConsidered in Calendars
- Apr 25, 2025HouseCommittee report sent to Calendars
- Apr 25, 2025HouseTransferred to Calendars Committee
- Apr 25, 2025HouseConsidered in Local & Consent Calendars
- Apr 23, 2025HouseComm. report sent to Local & Consent Calendar
- Apr 23, 2025HouseCommittee report distributed
- Apr 23, 2025HouseComte report filed with Committee Coordinator
- Apr 9, 2025HouseCommitteeReported favorably as substituted
- Apr 9, 2025HouseRecommended to be sent to Local & Consent
- Apr 9, 2025HouseCommittee substitute considered in committee
- Apr 9, 2025HouseConsidered in public hearing
- Apr 9, 2025HouseRecalled from subcommittee
- Apr 7, 2025HouseLeft pending in subcommittee
- Apr 7, 2025HouseTestimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
- Apr 7, 2025HouseCommittee substitute considered in s/c
- Apr 7, 2025HouseConsidered by s/c in public hearing
- Apr 7, 2025HouseScheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
- Mar 14, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to s/c on Defense & Veterans' Affairs by Speaker
- Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroducedRead first time
- Jan 24, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
CSHB 2061 was passed to engrossment
Total
144
- Yes
- 141
- No
- 0
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 3
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (144)
120 more members
Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance10How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy0Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment1Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
