POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah raises dog-bite arbitration award limit to $75,000 and exempts livestock guardian dog owners from liability

Original title: Dog Attack Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Jason Thompson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill addresses provisions related to injuries from dog attacks.

Why it matters

Dog attack victims gain a higher claims cap in while livestock owners receive specific liability protections when working dogs provoke incidents on grazing land.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Dog attack claimants

Claimants face a higher recovery cap of $75,000 in arbitration and gain a clarified four-year timeline to file lawsuits.

Directly affected

Livestock owners

Owners of livestock guardian dogs receive protection from liability when their dogs are provoked while herding or guarding on grazing land.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are livestock guardian dog owners liable if their dog injures someone while working?
No, a dog owner is not liable for injury or death caused by the dog if it is a provoked while engaged in guarding or herding livestock on grazing land.
How long does an injured person have to file a claim after a dog attack?
An individual may bring a claim for damages no later than four years after the day on which the injury occurs.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the House floor.

Procedural history

21 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ filed
  4. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ failed
  5. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ floor amendment
  6. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ uncircled
Show 15 earlier actions
  1. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ circled
  2. Feb 26, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  3. Feb 23, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  4. Feb 23, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  5. Feb 23, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  6. Feb 20, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  7. Feb 13, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  8. Feb 13, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0553
  9. Feb 13, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0553
  10. Feb 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  11. Feb 12, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  12. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0553
  13. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0553
  14. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  15. Feb 12, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Jason E. Thompson
PersonJason E. Thompson“Chief Sponsor of HB 553”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record