Proposed Changes to Florida Election Laws (SB 1414)
June 16, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Finance Connection
| Candidate | Donor | Amount | Industry | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blaise Ingoglia | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $35,853 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Oct 2025 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $30,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $16,500 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $15,161 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Feb 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $15,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Feb 2026 |
| Blaise Ingoglia | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,500 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Blaise Ingoglia | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,411 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | May 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | May 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Feb 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Feb 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | May 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Mar 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $10,000 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | Apr 2026 |
| Jay Collins | REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA | $9,805 | POLITICAL PARTY COMMITTEE | May 2026 |
Reported financial relationships and timing signals. This does not prove motive or influence. Readers draw their own conclusions.
The Frame
The bill would have fundamentally altered how Florida residents register to vote, request and submit petitions, and cast ballots, while increasing the investigative authority of state election officials and imposing new penalties for election-related activities.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Voters
Voters would face new identification and verification requirements for registration, petition signing, and vote-by-mail requests.
Supervisors of Elections
Supervisors would be required to implement new signature training, list maintenance procedures, and reporting requirements.
Third-party voter registration organizations
These organizations would face stricter delivery deadlines and new civil penalties for late or unsubmitted applications.
Candidates
Candidates would face new restrictions on campaign treasurers, qualifying fees, and petition form requirements.
Last recorded activity June 16, 2025.
Introduced.
Background
- SB 1414 was a 2025 legislative proposal that sought to modify various aspects of Florida's election code. context
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What would have happened if my citizenship status could not be verified online?
Did this bill change how I request a vote-by-mail ballot?
What new powers would the Office of Election Crimes and Security have received?
Why It Matters
The bill would have fundamentally altered how Florida residents register to vote, request and submit petitions, and cast ballots, while increasing the investigative authority of state election officials and imposing new penalties for election-related activities.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)
2026
“In support of the No Political Enemies Act to prevent executive punishing of individuals or organizations for constitutionally protected speech, belies, viewpoints, or political participation. In support of amending DHS appropriation riders to improve oversight and accountability on Department of Homeland security surveillance. In opposition to the SAVE America Act and requiring unnecessary barriers to voting. In support of increasing federal election security funding and identifying risks to election security and confidence posed by executive orders. In support of encouraging congressional members to uphold their legal duty to seat future lawfully elected members of Congress from the midterm elections. In support of reforms that strengthening the independence of the Judge Advocate General Corps through reforms of notification to Congress on before their termination. In support of reforms to protect independent legal advice within DoD and protect the non-political nature of the armed forces. In support of reforming the national emergencies framework to prevent executive abuses. Advocating in support of reforms that would prevent the executive branch from harming First Amendment rights of broadcasters. ”
Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)
2026
“In support of the No Political Enemies Act to prevent executive punishing of individuals or organizations for constitutionally protected speech, belies, viewpoints, or political participation. In support of amending DHS appropriation riders to improve oversight and accountability on Department of Homeland security surveillance. In opposition to the SAVE America Act and requiring unnecessary barriers to voting. In support of increasing federal election security funding and identifying risks to election security and confidence posed by executive orders. In support of encouraging congressional members to uphold their legal duty to seat future lawfully elected members of Congress from the midterm elections. In support of reforms that strengthening the independence of the Judge Advocate General Corps through reforms of notification to Congress on before their termination. In support of reforms to protect independent legal advice within DoD and protect the non-political nature of the armed forces. In support of reforming the national emergencies framework to prevent executive abuses. Advocating in support of reforms that would prevent the executive branch from harming First Amendment rights of broadcasters. ”
FGA ACTION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OPPORTUNITY SOLUTIONS PROJECT)
BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
on behalf of MELTSNER STRATEGIES ON BEHALF OF PROJECT FOR ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE
HB STRATEGIES
on behalf of KNOWINK
HB STRATEGIES
on behalf of LIBERTY VOTE
Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)
2025
“In support of the No Political Enemies Act to prevent executive punishing of individuals or organizations for constitutionally protected speech, belies, viewpoints, or political participation. In support of exploring enhanced reporting requirements to the Defense Production Act in the NDAA and tariff issuance to prevent executive abuse. In opposition to FCCs retaliatory agenda by advocating for meaningful First Amendment limits on its ability to punish news organizations for the content they air or the editorial decisions they make. In consideration of the Empowering SPEECH Act which primarily aims to protect First Amendment rights and related freedoms on college campuses In support of reforms that strengthening the independence of the Judge Advocate General Corps through reforms of notification to Congress on before their termination. In opposition to arbitrary deployments of National Guard members to American cities. In support of the Protecting Our Democracy Act to address abuses of presidential power, election security and integrity, and improving the system of checks and balances. In opposition to requiring documentary proof of citizenship through the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. In support of increasing federal election security funding. In support of maintaining the constitutional separation of powers ensuring that Congress has the power of the purse. ”
Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)
2025
“In support of increasing federal election security funding. In opposition to DC Home Rule Act being used for the extended federal takeover of the DC police. In support of a resolution ending the declared emergency in D.C. In opposition to arbitrary deployments of National Guard members to American cities. In support of the No Political Enemies Act to prevent executive punishing of individuals or organization for constitutionally protected speech, belies, viewpoints, or political participation. In support of the Protecting Our Democracy Act to address abuses of presidential power, election security and integrity, and improving the system of checks and balances. In support of reforms to the National Emergencies Act to prevent executive abuse. In support of exploring enhanced reporting requirements to the Defense Production Act and tariff issuance to prevent executive abuse. ”
Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)
2025
“In opposition to threats against the judiciary that erode constitutional safeguards, including the JUDGES Act (H.R. 1702), the PEPPER Act (H.R. 1789), the NORRA Act (H.R. 1526), and the Nationwide Injunction Abuse Prevention Act. In support of more robust funding to protect Congressional Members, staff, and families but also greater transparency on the threats. In support of judiciary security amendments to the reconciliation bill, (H.R.1) In support of the MARSHALS Act (S.1873) to transfer oversight of the U.S. Marshals to the judicial branch. In support of the Protecting Our Democracy Act to prevent abuses of Presidential power, restoring checks and balances and accountability and transparency in government, and defending elections against foreign interference In support of reforms to the National Emergencies Act. In opposition to the SAVE Act (H.R.22) and impediments to the right to vote. In support of federal election security funding. In opposition to the creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund. In opposition to Executive impoundment of congressionally appropriated funds. In opposition to politicization of the armed forces. In support of more transparency around RIFs and protection of the federal civil service. In opposition to tax bill language designating non-profits as "supporters of terrorism." In opposition to reducing the funding of the Government Accountability Office. ”
Protect Democracy United (formerly known as UNITED TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY)
2025
“In support of an amendment to the constitution regarding the presidential pardon power. Advocating for sets of questions to be asked during DOJ and OPM nominations to produce concessions and straight answers from nominees that might threaten the rule of law. In opposition to executive impoundments of Congressionally appropriated funds. In support of Congress's power of the purse powers during reconciliation process. In support of reforms to the National Emergencies Act through H.R.3988, the Article One Act. In opposition of the SAVE Act. In opposition to decreasing federal election funding, including funding for protection of elections officias and CISA. In support of proper enforcement of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act and proper use of recess appointments powers. In opposition to the Reorganization Act. In support of protecting the right to vote and preparation for/prevention of election subversion and certification issues. In support of educating Congressional members on preventing abuse of executive power, including restoring Congress as a meaningful check on executive authority. ”
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Centralization of Election Oversight
The bill reflects a clear trend toward increasing the investigative and enforcement powers of the Department of State and the Office of Election Crimes and Security.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance90How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy85Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools