POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill HB 5477 mandates 287(g) immigration agreements for all state law enforcement and jails

Original title: Relating to federal immigration enforcement.

Last action · February 12, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsors: Bill Ridenour and 6 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 5477 requires all West Virginia state-supported law enforcement agencies and detention facilities to enter into formal 287(g) cooperation agreements with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by April 1, 2026. The bill mandates that jails with 300 or more beds use the , establishes minimum information-sharing standards, and authorizes the withholding of state public-safety funds for noncompliant agencies.

Why it matters

Local law enforcement agencies and jails face the mandatory adoption of federal immigration duties and potential forfeiture of state public-safety funding if they fail to execute and maintain required ICE agreements within specified statutory timelines.

Background
  • The 287(g) program is a federal initiative under the Immigration and Nationality Act that allows state and local law enforcement agencies to enter into agreements with ICE to perform designated immigration enforcement functions. context
  • House Bill 5477 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the West Virginia Legislature by lead sponsor Delegate Ridenour and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State-supported law enforcement agencies

State police, sheriff's offices, municipal police departments, and jail operators must apply for and maintain 287(g) agreements, adopt information-sharing policies, submit semi-annual reports, and risk state funding forfeiture for noncompliance.

Directly affected

Detention facility operators

Operators of jails and holding centers must comply with specific 287(g) model requirements based on facility operational capacity, designate liaison officers, and ensure staff are trained and certified.

Directly affected

Attorney General

The Attorney General is tasked with receiving ICE denial documentation, conducting audits, receiving compliance reports, issuing deficiency notices, and initiating legal enforcement actions.

Directly affected

State Treasurer

The State Treasurer must receive ICE denial records, withhold and escrow state public-safety funds from noncompliant agencies, and establish administrative hearing procedures.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which law enforcement agencies and facilities are covered by HB 5477?
The bill covers the State Police, state agencies with sworn officers, county sheriff's offices, municipal police departments, and regional jail authorities or contracted detention providers that receive state funds or operate facilities housing persons on behalf of the state.
What happens if a detention facility with 300 or more beds cannot get the Jail Enforcement Model from ICE?
The facility may operate under the only upon receiving written denial from ICE. Within 60 days of the denial, the facility must execute a WSO agreement and reapply annually for the unless ICE states reapplication is unnecessary.
What are the financial penalties for noncompliance with the immigration enforcement requirements?
The State Treasurer must withhold state funds distributed for law enforcement, corrections, detention, and public safety grants. Funds are escrowed for up to 180 days, and if not cured, they lapse and are redistributed to compliant agencies.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Judiciary
  2. Feb 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory 287(g) Adoption and Funding Conditioning

HB 5477 shifts state policy from permissive cooperation to a strict mandate requiring all state-supported law enforcement and qualifying jails to maintain active 287(g) agreements, backed by the withholding of state public-safety funds.

Connected Entities

Bill Ridenour, Jim Butler, United States Department of Homeland Security and 9 more
PersonBill Ridenour“Lead sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
PersonJim Butler“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Homeland Security“Federal department authorizing immigration enforcement delegations under 8 U.S.C”Map →
PersonJosh Holstein“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
OrganizationState Treasurer“State official responsible for withholding state funds from noncompliant agencie”Map →
PersonJoe Funkhouser“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“State official authorized to enforce compliance, receive denial documentation, c”Map →
PersonRick Hillenbrand“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
PersonBryan Ward“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
PersonChris Phillips“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5477”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Immigration and Customs Enforcement“Federal agency entering into 287(g) agreements with state and local law enforcem”Map →
OrganizationJoint Committee on Government Organization“Legislative committee receiving semi-annual reports on 287(g) status from covere”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz65
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record