POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The Frame

What this does

The bill would have increased operational costs for large community associations and imposed new compliance duties on board members to verify the professional licenses of their management firms.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

Community association board members

They would have been legally required to verify the licensing status of management firms before entering into contracts.

Community association management firms

They would have been required to obtain $1 million in errors or omissions insurance and meet specific licensing requirements to serve associations with $750,000+ in revenue.

Timeshare management firms

They would have been subject to specific regulatory exemptions and priority of application rules regarding their management practices.

What changed

Last recorded activity March 13, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

This bill would have required community association management firms to carry $1 million in liability insurance and mandated that associations with $750,000 or more in annual revenue hire professional management firms. It also established stricter licensing oversight and permanent license revocation for managers convicted of specific felonies.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Would this bill have affected my homeowners' association?
Only if your association has $750,000 or more in total annual revenue, in which case it would have been required to hire a professional management firm.
What happens if a manager is convicted of a felony?
Under the bill, the department would have been required to immediately revoke the manager's license and permanently bar them from future licensure.
Did this bill pass?
No, the bill died on the Second Reading Calendar on March 13, 2026.

Why It Matters

The bill would have increased operational costs for large community associations and imposed new compliance duties on board members to verify the professional licenses of their management firms.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

HEIM NOACK KELLY & SPAHNN

on behalf of CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY MANAGERS

Senate LDAView filing →

DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC

on behalf of CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2021

GOVERNMENT ISSUESHEALTH ISSUES

THE TELEHEALTH MODERNIZATION ACT (H.R. 1332/ S.368) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC views telehealth expansion as critical for cancer patient access to healthcare providers. THE SAFE STEP ACT (H.R.2163/S.464) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC views step therapy in the use of cancer care delivery to be a hinderance to best practice and timely treatment/access of care for patients. THE ACCESS TO GENETIC COUNSELOR SERVICES ACT (H.R. 2144/S.1450) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC views genetic counselors as integral members of the cancer care delivery team in oncology programs/practices in the US. THE RESEARCH INVESTMENT TO SPARK THE ECONOMY (RISE) ACT (H.R. 869/S.289) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC understands the importance of research funding for the NIH and oncology investigators to promote clinical trials that impact improving cancer outcomes. THE MEDICARE MULTI-CANCER EARLY DETECTION SCREENING COVERAGE ACT OF 2021 (H.R. 1946) Organized a Virtual Capitol Hill Day for ACCC members (70+) on May 12th, 2021. Created one-pagers and talking points on importance of this legislation. ACCC advocates for the use and coverage of cancer screening modalities that will diagnose cancer at earlier stages therefore improving patient outcomes. MOST FAVORED NATION (Proposed by Trump Administration at end of 2020) ACCC entered into a lawsuit against HHS in December 2020 opposing the Most Favored Nation proposal tying drug reimbursements to international reference pricing. By lowering reimbursement to cancer programs and practices, patient access to care would be limited as supportive cancer care services limited due to lack of reimbursement to cover positions. ACCC was concerned over programs/practices closing if proposal were to move forward. ACCC met with one Senators office on this topic expressing concern in January 2021. RADIATION ONCOLOGY MODEL (Proposed by CMMI) ACCC met with 1 Senate office and 1 House office over concerns re: this alternative payment model. ACCC has concerns over mandatory nature of Radiation Oncology model testing reimbursement rates and potentially limiting access to care for patients who are recommended radiation for their cancer diagnosis, particularly in rural areas of the U.S.

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2018

MEDICARE/MEDICAIDHEALTH ISSUES

Flexibility in implementing CMS' Quality Payment Program Limiting the role of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI)

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2019

HEALTH ISSUESMEDICARE/MEDICAID

ACCC advocated to the US House of Representatives and US Senate on the following issues: (1) passage of a federal oral parity bill in US Congress in support of H.R. 1730 (Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2019) and S. 741 (Cancer Drug Parity Act of 2019) to see the same out of pocket cost sharing for oral chemotherapy as IV chemotherapy and (2) passage of H.R. 913 CLINICAL TREATMENT Act in support of Medicaid funding for routine care costs for cancer patients in clinical trials.

RON TABACZYNSKI

on behalf of BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO

Senate LDAView filing →

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2018

MEDICARE/MEDICAIDHEALTH ISSUES

Excluding Part B payments from CMS' Merit Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) adjustment under the Quality Payment Program (QPP) Reimbursement for care planning for cancer patients in the Medicare Program (The Cancer Care Planning & Communications (CCPC) Act (H.R. 5160))

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2017

MEDICARE/MEDICAIDHEALTH ISSUES

Flexibility in implementing CMS' Quality Payment Program Limiting the role of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI)

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2017

MEDICARE/MEDICAIDHEALTH ISSUES

Flexibility in implementing CMS' Quality Payment Program Limiting the role of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI)

(C) MANAGEMENT INC.

on behalf of Association of Community Cancer Centers

2017

MEDICARE/MEDICAIDHEALTH ISSUES

Flexibility in implementing CMS' Quality Payment Program Limiting the role of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI)

Voting Record

Sponsors

Show 1 more sponsor

Discoveries

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Mandatory Professional Management

The bill attempted to shift the management of larger associations (>$750k revenue) from optional to mandatory professional management.

Connected Entities

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record