POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Pennsylvania Establishes Smart Growth Zoning Program and Fund to Incentivize Attainable Housing

Original title: An Act amending Title 53 (Municipalities Generally) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, establishing the Smart Growth Zoning and Housing Program and the Smart Growth Zoning District Fund.

Last action · February 10, 2025: Referred to HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, Feb. 10, 2025Sponsors: Jim Prokopiak and 14 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Pennsylvania House Bill 529 establishes the Smart Growth Zoning and Housing Program and the Smart Growth Zoning District Fund to distribute financial incentives and s to municipalities that adopt approved smart growth zoning districts. The legislation sets minimum density requirements, mandates that at least 20% of residential units in projects exceeding 12 units be , and takes effect in one year.

Why it matters

Municipalities that adopt qualifying zoning ordinances become eligible for upfront incentive payments ranging from $10,000 to $600,000 based on projected units, plus $3,000 per unit created, while facing repayment obligations if construction deadlines are missed or ordinances are repealed.

Background
  • House Bill 529 was introduced in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on February 10, 2025, by Representative Prokopiak and 14 cosponsors, and was referred to the House Committee on Housing and Community Development. context
  • Title 53 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes governs municipalities generally across the Commonwealth. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Municipalities

Municipalities may adopt smart growth zoning ordinances, apply for program approval, receive state incentive and density bonus payments, and assume responsibility for project reviews and repayments.

Directly affected

Developers

Developers proposing residential or mixed-use projects within approved smart growth districts are subject to specific density, design, and attainable housing requirements, and benefit from streamlined municipal review procedures.

Directly affected

Department of Community and Economic Development

The department is required to establish program guidelines, review and approve municipal applications, administer the fund, issue certificates of compliance, and submit annual reports to the General Assembly.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered attainable housing under this program?
is defined as housing attainable to and occupied by individuals and families whose annual income is equal to or less than 120% of the areawide median income as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
How much are municipalities paid when they establish a smart growth zoning district?
Zoning incentive payments are based on projected units of new construction: $10,000 for up to 20 units; $75,000 for 21 to 100 units; $200,000 for 101 to 200 units; $350,000 for 201 to 500 units; and $600,000 for 501 or more units.
What happens if a municipality applies for a smart growth district and the department does not respond?
If the department does not make a determination on a complete application within 60 days of receipt, the application shall be deemed approved.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, Feb. 10, 2025

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Tying Discretionary Funding to Smart Growth

Section 6307 coordinates policy across the Department of Community and Economic Development, the Department of Environmental Protection, and the Department of Transportation to favor municipalities with approved smart growth districts when awarding discretionary infrastructure and housing money.

Connected Entities

Department of Transportation, Malcolm Kenyatta, Carol Hill-Evans and 16 more
OrganizationDepartment of Transportation“State department utilizing discretionary money methodologies”Map →
PersonMalcolm Kenyatta“Cosponsor, District 181”Map →
PersonCarol Hill-Evans“Cosponsor, District 95”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Housing and Urban Development“Federal agency determining areawide median income”Map →
PersonJohanny Cepeda-Freytiz“Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Community and Economic Development“Department responsible for administering the Smart Growth Zoning and Housing Pro”Map →
PersonJim Prokopiak“Primary sponsor of House Bill 529, District 140”Map →
PersonMary Jo Daley“Cosponsor, District 148”Map →
PersonJim Haddock“Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Environmental Protection“State department utilizing discretionary money methodologies”Map →
PersonRoni Green“Cosponsor, District 190”Map →
PersonHeather Boyd“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonMike Schlossberg“Cosponsor, District 132”Map →
PersonTarik Khan“Cosponsor, District 194”Map →
PersonMaureen Madden“Cosponsor, District 115”Map →
PersonJosé Giral“Cosponsor, District 180”Map →
PersonMelissa Shusterman“Cosponsor, District 157”Map →
PersonMissy Cerrato“Cosponsor”Map →
PersonBen Sanchez“Cosponsor, District 153”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.palegis.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record