POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah Revises Pretrial Release Rules, Mandates Data Reporting, and Adjusts Sheriff Release Authority

Original title: Bail Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsors: Matt MacPherson and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill addresses bail.

Why it matters

Changes how local jails and courts handle pretrial release decisions for arrested individuals, requiring specific financial and personal data collection at booking while establishing annual legislative oversight of pretrial programs.

Background
  • Utah's pretrial release and bail statutes have undergone major legislative restructuring in recent years, including revisions to non-financial release conditions and judicial discretion. context
  • The Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice serves as an executive branch agency in Utah that coordinates criminal justice policies and oversees state-level data collection. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Law Enforcement Agencies

Required to collect detailed booking information, supervise defendants under specific conditions, and submit annual pretrial release data reports.

Directly affected

Pretrial Services Programs

Must gather individual financial and personal circumstances at booking, monitor released defendants, and report non-compliance or new charges.

Directly affected

Magistrates and Judges

Must follow updated criteria regarding temporary pretrial status orders, restrictions on own-recognizance release, and financial condition assessments.

Directly affected

Individuals Arrested and Booked into Jail

Subject to mandatory financial and personal data collection upon booking, new detention holding periods, and revised pretrial release conditions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What information must be collected when an individual is booked into a jail facility without a warrant?
Jail employees or pretrial services staff must submit identification details, residential address, pending charges or warrants, probation/parole status, prior pretrial release status, detailed financial circumstances, community ties, lethality assessment results, and intoxication status to the court.
Can information collected during the booking process be used in a regular criminal trial against the defendant?
No, booking information collected under Section 77-20-202 is inadmissible in court proceedings other than pretrial release or indigency hearings for the current charges, or for prosecuting false statements made during booking.
What reporting requirements are established for pretrial release programs?
Agencies supervising pretrial individuals must report annual data on supervised individuals, new offenses committed during supervision, noncompliance reports, and revocations to the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice by April 30 each year starting in 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the House · in the Senate.

Procedural history

34 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  3. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  4. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ strike enacting clause
  5. Mar 6, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0593S02
  6. Mar 6, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0593S02
Show 28 earlier actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0593S02
  2. Mar 6, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0593S02
  3. Mar 4, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  4. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  5. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  6. Mar 3, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ uncircled
  8. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ circled
  9. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  10. Mar 2, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0593S01
  11. Mar 2, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0593S01
  12. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  13. Mar 2, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ substituted/ amended
  14. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  15. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Amendment Recommendation
  16. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  17. Mar 1, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0593S01
  18. Mar 1, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0593S01
  19. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  20. Feb 25, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  21. Feb 25, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0593
  22. Feb 25, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0593
  23. Feb 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  24. Feb 20, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  25. Feb 20, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0593
  26. Feb 20, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0593
  27. Feb 20, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  28. Feb 20, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

2 patterns noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Mandatory Pretrial Data Tracking and Reporting

The bill introduces statutory reporting requirements obligating law enforcement and pretrial services to track supervision outcomes and submit data annually to the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice and the Judiciary Interim Committee.

cross reference95% confidence

Coordination with S.B. 323

The bill includes a specific coordination clause to seamlessly update agency naming conventions if S.B. 323 (Criminal and Juvenile Justice Recodification) also becomes law on September 1, 2026.

Connected Entities

Judiciary Interim Committee, Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice, Administrative Office of the Courts and 2 more
OrganizationJudiciary Interim Committee“Receives annual compilations and reports regarding pretrial release and supervis”Map →
OrganizationCommission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice“Receives annual pretrial release data reports from supervisory agencies”Map →
OrganizationAdministrative Office of the Courts“Required to report specific release statistics to the Judiciary Interim Committe”Map →
PersonMatt MacPherson“Chief Sponsor of HB 593 in the Utah House of Representatives”Map →
PersonBrady Brammer“Senate Sponsor of HB 593”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record