POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Rhode Island permits authorized agents to file judicial security notices on behalf of protected individuals

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--COURTS -- COURT ADMINISTRATION (For purposes of the judicial security act permits an authorized agent to file a written notice with a state, county, or municipal agency on behalf of a protected individual.)

Last action · June 19, 2026: Signed by GovernorSponsors: Carol McEntee and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

An may now file a written notice with any state, county, or municipal agency on behalf of a protected individual for the purposes of the .

Why it matters

Expands administrative filing options for individuals covered under judicial security rules by allowing representation through s.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Protected Individuals

Protected individuals are permitted to have an authorized agent file written security notices on their behalf with government agencies.

Directly affected

State, County, and Municipal Agencies

Agencies must accept written notices filed by authorized agents on behalf of protected individuals.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is allowed to file the written notice on behalf of a protected individual?
An is permitted to file the written notice with the relevant agency.
Which agencies can receive the written notice under this law?
The written notice may be filed with any state, county, or municipal agency.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Jun 19, 2026Enrolled
    Signed by Governor
  2. Jun 16, 2026
    Transmitted to Governor
  3. Jun 9, 2026Floor
    Senate passed in concurrence
  4. Jun 5, 2026
    Placed on Senate Calendar (06/09/2026)
  5. May 28, 2026Floor
    Committee recommends passage in concurrence
  6. May 26, 2026
    Scheduled for consideration (05/28/2026)
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. May 1, 2026Committee
    Referred to Senate Judiciary
  2. Apr 14, 2026Floor
    House read and passed
  3. Apr 10, 2026
    Placed on House Calendar (04/14/2026)
  4. Apr 9, 2026Floor
    Committee recommends passage
  5. Apr 3, 2026
    Scheduled for consideration (04/09/2026)
  6. Feb 26, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  7. Feb 19, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (02/26/2026)
  8. Feb 11, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to House Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

David Bennett, Jason Knight, Matthew Dawson and 3 more
PersonDavid Bennett“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonJason Knight“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMatthew Dawson“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonJustine Caldwell“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonTina Spears“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCarol McEntee“Primary sponsor of House Bill 7640”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record