POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Louisiana expands bank protections against elderly financial exploitation and sets employee training rules

Original title: BANKS/BANKING: Provides relative to elderly financial exploitation

Last action · June 1, 2026: Effective date: 08/01/2026.Sponsors: Kim Carver and 12 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Louisiana enacts new rules allowing banks to notify s and delay suspicious transactions for up to 60 business days while mandating staff training on elder fraud beginning January 1, 2027.

Why it matters

Banks gain explicit legal authority to halt transactions and contact designated third parties when elder financial exploitation is suspected, extending transaction hold times from 15 to up to 60 business days upon agency request.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Eligible adults

Eligible adults may have their financial transactions delayed and their trusted contacts notified by financial institutions if exploitation is suspected.

Directly affected

Covered financial institutions

Financial institutions must implement employee training programs by January 1, 2027, and are granted extended time windows to hold suspicious transactions.

Directly affected

Trusted contacts

Individuals designated by eligible adults may be contacted by financial institutions if exploitation is suspected or attempted.

Key Facts

  • Expands the legal definition of financial exploitation to include scams, deceptive schemes, extortion, and impersonation of government officials causing money transfers to strangers.
  • Includes the use of fraud, false pretenses, or misrepresentation for personal gain at the expense of an eligible adult as financial exploitation.
  • Defines a 'trusted contact' as a person age 18 or older authorized by an eligible adult whom banks can contact regarding suspected exploitation.
  • Requires covered financial institutions to provide employee training on recognizing and responding to elder exploitation signs beginning January 1, 2027.
Show all 7 facts
  • Extends the standard expiration period for a delayed financial transaction from 15 business days to 45 business days.
  • Allows covered agencies to request an extension of a transaction delay, pushing the maximum total hold time from 25 business days to 60 business days.
  • Clarifies that nothing in the statute limits a financial institution's independent contractual rights to delay transactions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What new actions are considered financial exploitation under this law?
Financial exploitation now explicitly includes scams, deceptive schemes, extortion, government official impersonation, and any use of fraud or misrepresentation for personal gain at the expense of an .
How long can a bank hold a suspicious financial transaction?
A bank can hold a transaction for up to 45 business days normally, and up to 60 business days if a covered agency requests an extension.
Who can a bank contact if they suspect an older adult is being scammed?
Banks are authorized to notify third parties reasonably associated with the , including an authorized who is at least 18 years old.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

22 actions
  1. Jun 1, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 654.
  2. Jun 1, 2026House
    Effective date: 08/01/2026.
  3. May 29, 2026House
    Sent to the Governor for executive approval.
  4. May 28, 2026HouseEnrolled
    Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.
  5. May 28, 2026SenateEnrolled
    Signed by the President of the Senate.
  6. May 27, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, roll called, yeas 97, nays 0, Senate amendments concurred in.
Show 16 earlier actions
  1. May 26, 2026House
    Scheduled for concurrence on 05/27/2026.
  2. May 25, 2026House
    Received from the Senate with amendments.
  3. May 21, 2026SenateFloor
    Rules suspended. The amended bill was read by title, passed by a vote of 35 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
  4. May 18, 2026SenateFloor
    Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
  5. May 14, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
  6. May 13, 2026Senate
    Reported with amendments.
  7. Mar 25, 2026SenateCommittee
    Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Consumer Protection and International Affairs.
  8. Mar 24, 2026HouseFloor
    Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 98, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
  9. Mar 24, 2026Senate
    Received in the Senate. Rules suspended. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
  10. Mar 23, 2026House
    Scheduled for floor debate on 03/24/2026.
  11. Mar 18, 2026HouseFloor
    Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
  12. Mar 17, 2026House
    Reported with amendments (14-0).
  13. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Commerce.
  14. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  15. Feb 26, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  16. Feb 26, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Extension of Financial Hold Limits

The state significantly extended the window during which financial institutions can legally freeze suspicious transactions from 15 to 45 days normal, and up to 60 days with agency involvement.

Connected Entities

Terry Landry, Dixon McMakin, Jessica Domangue and 8 more
PersonTerry Landry“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonDixon McMakin“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonJessica Domangue“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonVincent Cox“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonDelisha Boyd“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonShaun Mena“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonCandace Newell“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonKim Carver“Primary sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonJacob Landry“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonEdmond Jordan“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →
PersonTehmi Chassion“Co-sponsor of House Bill No. 555”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record