POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Arizona Bill SB 1650 Creates Civil Rights Exception to Judicial Immunity for Public Entities

Original title: judicial immunity; exception

Last action · February 18, 2026: DPSponsor: Mark Finchem

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Arizona SB 1650 creates an exception to absolute judicial immunity for public entities, allowing liability if a judicial officer performed a while knowing or having reason to know that their actions violated the civil rights of a litigant or affected person.

Why it matters

Changes whether public entities are shielded from lawsuits when judicial officers violate civil rights, potentially altering legal exposure and liability for state and local government operations.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public entities

Public entities lose absolute immunity protection for judicial functions if a judicial officer violates a litigant's or affected person's civil rights.

Directly affected

Litigants and affected persons

Adult and minor litigants or affected persons gain the ability to hold public entities liable when judicial actions violate their civil rights.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does SB 1650 eliminate judicial immunity entirely?
No, it creates a specific exception for s where a judicial officer knew or should have known that their actions violated someone's civil rights.
Who can be affected by the civil rights violation exception?
Adult or minor litigants, as well as any adult or minor affected by the case in controversy.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Feb 18, 2026SenateCommittee
    DP
  2. Feb 10, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Second Reading
  3. Feb 9, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Mark Finchem, Arizona
PersonMark Finchem“Senator who introduced SB 1650”Map →
locationArizona“State where the legislation was introduced”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record