The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island bill establishes ranked-choice voting tabulation rules and presidential primary regulations
Last action · April 7, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Sam Zurier and 2 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Rhode Island Senate Bill 2590 establishes rules and regulations for elections and sets standards for ranked-choice voting tabulation and results reporting by the secretary of state.
The measure changes how presidential primary elections and ranked-choice voting tabulation are administered and reported by state election officials.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
voters
secretary of state
The secretary of state is responsible for tabulating ranked-choice voting and reporting results.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the bill do regarding ranked choice voting?
What elections does this bill affect?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- Apr 7, 2026Committee recommended measure be held for further study
- Apr 3, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (04/07/2026)
- Feb 13, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to Senate Judiciary
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy50Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz35Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
