The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Idaho House Bill 809 establishes school of origin protections and hearings for children in protective custody
Last action · March 3, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Health & Welfare
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Idaho House Board 809 requires the Department of Health and Welfare to presume that remaining in their current school is in the best interest of a child removed from home, and establishes formal procedures for written notice, party objections, and court hearings regarding school placement changes.
Establishes a legal presumption and formal hearing process for maintaining educational continuity for children placed into state protective custody, shifting the burden of proof to the department when moving a child to a new school.
- Idaho's Child Protective Act governs state intervention, shelter care, and foster placement proceedings for abused, neglected, or abandoned children. context
- House Bill 809 was introduced by the House Health and Welfare Committee during the 2026 legislative session. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Children in protective custody
Their school placement upon removal is subject to a legal presumption of continuity and formal hearing procedures.
Department of Health and Welfare
Must evaluate school placement immediately upon removal, provide written notice within three business days, and bear the burden of proof in school transfer disputes.
Parents and legal guardians
Receive formal written notice of school placement decisions, have the right to object, and can present evidence at evidentiary hearings.
Key Facts
- Establishes a legal presumption that remaining in the school of origin is in the best interests of a child removed from their home.
- Requires the department to provide formal written notice of its school placement determination to parties within three business days of making the decision.
- Allows any party to object to the department's school placement determination by filing an objection with the court within fourteen days of receiving notice.
- Requires the child to remain in the school of origin until the objection period passes and any disputes are resolved, except in cases of immediate physical safety risks.
Show all 6 facts
- Places the burden of proof on the department to show that a school change is in the child's best interests and that reasonable accommodations cannot keep the child in the school of origin.
- Mandates that the court hold an evidentiary hearing within fourteen days of a requested school placement objection.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a school of origin under this bill?
How long do parties have to object to a department decision to change a child's school?
Who bears the burden of proof during a school placement dispute?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Mar 3, 2026CommitteeReported Printed and Referred to Health & Welfare
- Mar 2, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Formalization of Educational Continuity
The measure adds dedicated statutory protections and a court hearing process specifically for school placement retention during child protective custody removals.
Connected Entities
Sources
legislature.idaho.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
- Controversy20Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools