The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Congress considers authorizing Army to transfer Fort Bragg land to North Carolina for veterans' home
Last action · August 27, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.Sponsors: Richard Hudson and 13 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This bill authorizes the Secretary of the Army to transfer a specific of land at Fort Bragg to the State of North Carolina. The land is designated for the construction of a new state-run veterans' home.
This transfer would provide the physical site necessary for North Carolina to expand its long-term care capacity for military veterans.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
State of North Carolina
The state is the recipient of the land parcel and is responsible for constructing the veterans' home.
Veterans
Veterans in the region may be served by the new state home once constructed.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of this land transfer?
Who is responsible for the land transfer?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
9 actions- Sep 15, 2026SenateCommitteeReceived in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- Sep 14, 2026HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Sep 14, 2026HouseFloorOn motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5544)
- Sep 14, 2026HouseFloorPassed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
- Sep 14, 2026HouseDEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 10159.
- Sep 14, 2026HouseConsidered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5544-5545)
Show 3 earlier actions
- Sep 14, 2026HouseMr. Harrigan moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- Aug 27, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Aug 27, 2026HouseIntroducedIntroduced in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 9 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance45How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
