The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas Proposes Three-Fifths Voter Approval Threshold for School District Bonds
Last action · August 20, 2025: FiledSponsor: Mike Olcott
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Texas House 31 proposes a constitutional amendment to require a three-fifths majority of voters to approve school district bond elections, replacing the traditional simple majority requirement.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
School districts
School districts must secure a three-fifths supermajority rather than a simple majority from voters to pass bond elections.
Qualified voters of school districts
Voters face a higher approval threshold of three-fifths to authorize local school district bond debt.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What voting majority is currently required for school district bonds versus what H.J.R. 31 proposes?
When will voters decide on this proposed constitutional amendment?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Aug 20, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
