POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Louisiana Bill Prohibits Private Expropriation for Carbon Dioxide Pipelines and Storage

Original title: PROPERTY/EXPROPRIATION: Enacts the Louisiana Landowners Protection Act (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF RV)

Last action · March 31, 2026: Involuntarily deferred in committee.Sponsors: Mike Johnson and 7 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 7 prohibits private entities from using or eminent domain for transporting carbon dioxide by pipeline or for its . The measure also removes the authority of the secretary of the Department of Energy and Conservation to issue or order unit operations for carbon dioxide storage.

Why it matters

Property owners retain full control over their land against private takings for carbon dioxide projects, as private companies lose the legal authority to force land acquisition for pipelines and sequestration sites.

Background
  • The expansion of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) projects across southern states has led to significant debates regarding the use of eminent domain for interstate and intrastate carbon dioxide pipelines. context
  • Expropriation refers to the legal power of the state or authorized entities to take private property for public use upon payment of just compensation. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

private property owners

Directly affected

carbon dioxide pipeline operators

Private pipeline operators lose the legal authority to use eminent domain to secure rights-of-way for carbon dioxide transport.

Directly affected

storage operators

Geologic storage operators lose expropriation powers and the ability to obtain unitization orders or certificates of public convenience and necessity from the secretary.

Key Facts

  • Enacts the Louisiana Landowners Protection Act under House Bill 7.
  • Prohibits expropriation by private entities for transporting carbon dioxide by pipeline or for geologic storage.
  • Defines private entities to include any juridical person other than the state, its political subdivisions, the United States, or its agencies.
  • Removes statutory authority for the secretary of the Department of Energy and Conservation to issue certificates of public convenience and necessity for carbon dioxide storage facilities and certain pipelines.
Show all 8 facts
  • Repeals secretary authority to order unit operation for carbon dioxide storage facilities.
  • Adds protecting the state's natural resources and safeguarding individual constitutional rights to the state's primary responsibilities alongside complying with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act.
  • Repeals R.S. 19:2(10) and (11), R.S. 30:4(C)(17)(b), 1104.2, and 1108 in their entirety.
  • Stipulates that no order, permit, or certificate issued prior to the effective date shall confer any right of eminent domain or expropriating authority.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill stop private companies from using eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines?
Yes. House Bill 7 explicitly prohibits private entities from using for transporting carbon dioxide by pipeline or for .
What authority is removed from the Department of Energy and Conservation?
The bill removes the secretary's authority to issue for carbon dioxide storage facilities and certain pipelines, and eliminates the authority to order unit operations for carbon dioxide storage.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Mar 31, 2026House
    Involuntarily deferred in committee.
  2. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.
  3. Jan 23, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 1/23/2026.
  4. Jan 12, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  5. Jan 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and Environment.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Reversal of Private Expropriation for Carbon Sequestration

The bill shifts state policy by repealing provisions that previously allowed private pipeline and storage companies to use eminent domain for carbon dioxide projects.

Connected Entities

Department of Energy and Conservation, Rodney Schamerhorn, Jason DeWitt and 6 more
OrganizationDepartment of Energy and Conservation“State agency whose secretary's authority over carbon dioxide unitization and cer”Map →
PersonRodney Schamerhorn“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →
PersonJason DeWitt“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →
PersonRhonda Butler“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →
PersonCharles Owen“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →
PersonGabe Firment“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →
PersonKathy Edmonston“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →
PersonMike Johnson“Representative who introduced House Bill 7”Map →
PersonBrett Geymann“Co-sponsor of House Bill 7”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record