The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Rhode Island Bill H 7462 Codifies Child Care Copayments and Expands Zero-Copay Eligibility to 125% of FPL
Last action · May 14, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Grace Diaz and 8 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Rhode Island bill H 7462 establishes statutory child care copayments, eliminates copayments entirely for families earning under 125% of the federal poverty level, and caps most family copayments at 6% while maintaining a 7% statutory maximum.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
working families
Eligible households experience changes to their child care copayment requirements, including zero copays for those under 125% FPL and a 6% cap for others.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who qualifies for zero child care copayments under this bill?
What is the maximum copayment percentage established for most families?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
3 actions- May 14, 2026Committee recommended measure be held for further study
- May 8, 2026Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (05/14/2026)
- Jan 30, 2026IntroducedIntroduced, referred to House Finance
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 4 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
status.rilegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
- Controversy15Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
