Proposed Restrictions on Services and Employment for Unauthorized Aliens
January 8, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently Died in State Affairs Committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
15 actions- Feb 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
- Feb 13, 2026HouseNow in State Affairs Committee
- Feb 13, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Judiciary Committee
- Feb 13, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs Committee
- Feb 12, 2026HouseIntroducedCS Filed
- Feb 12, 2026HouseLaid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
Show 9 earlier actions
- Feb 12, 2026HouseReported out of Commerce Committee
- Feb 10, 2026HouseCommitteeFavorable with CS by Commerce Committee
- Feb 6, 2026HouseAdded to Commerce Committee agenda
- Jan 15, 2026HouseNow in Commerce Committee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Judiciary Committee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to State Affairs Committee
- Jan 15, 2026HouseCommitteeReferred to Commerce Committee
- Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
- Jan 8, 2026HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill would have changed legal requirements for employers, insurers, and financial institutions regarding documentation and liability, potentially affecting the cost of workers' compensation and the availability of financial services for individuals unable to provide proof of lawful presence.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Employers
Employers would have faced new verification requirements, personal liability for workplace injuries, and penalties for hiring unauthorized aliens.
Unauthorized aliens
Individuals without lawful presence would have been ineligible for state licenses, down payment assistance, and certain financial services.
Financial institutions
State-chartered banks and remittance licensees would have been required to verify the legal status of customers and senders.
Insurers
Insurers would have been required to apply a presumption of fault against unauthorized out-of-state drivers in accident claims.
Current stage: Died in State Affairs Committee.
Floor Vote.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did this bill become law?
How would this have affected car insurance claims?
What would have happened to employers who hired unauthorized aliens?
Why It Matters
The bill would have changed legal requirements for employers, insurers, and financial institutions regarding documentation and liability, potentially affecting the cost of workers' compensation and the availability of financial services for individuals unable to provide proof of lawful presence.
News Coverage
Voting Record
Favorable With Committee Substitute (Commerce Committee)
Total
44
Yes
35
No
8
Present
0
Not Voting
1
Abstain
0
How they voted (44)
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · no
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · no
Chip LaMarca
Republican · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
Peggy Gossett-Seidman
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Kim Daniels
Democratic · yes
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Jason Shoaf
Republican · yes
Yvette Benarroch
Republican · yes
Felicia Robinson
Democratic · no
Chuck Brannan
Republican · yes
James Buchanan
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · no
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
+ 20 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of State-Level Immigration Enforcement
The bill represents a significant attempt to integrate immigration status verification into routine state-regulated activities like banking, insurance claims, and workers' compensation.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy95Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools