POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Nevada Senate Bill 363 Eliminates Employer Vicarious Liability and Caps Personal Injury Medical Damages

Original title: AN ACT relating to civil actions; removing and repealing provisions relating to vicarious liability; revising provisions governing comparative negligence; requiring a trier of fact to consider the fault of all persons, including persons not named as a party, in an action to recover damages for death or injury to persons or for injury to property; authorizing the admission of certain evidence in certain civil actions; limiting the amount of medical expenses recoverable as damages in certain civil actions; limiting the amount of fees that a private attorney or representative may receive in proceedings under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act; and providing other matters properly relating thereto.

Last action · April 12, 2025: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)Sponsor: Ira Hansen

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 363 eliminates employer liability for employee wrongful acts, repeals joint and several liability, caps personal injury medical damage recoveries at actual insurance payment amounts or 120 percent of Medicare/Medicaid rates, and restricts private attorney fees in industrial insurance cases to 20 percent.

Why it matters

This measure alters how civil damages are distributed by removing employer responsibility for employee torts, requiring juries to weigh the fault of all contributing parties including nonparties, and limiting recoverable medical expenses and workers' compensation legal fees.

Background
  • The doctrine of vicarious liability traditionally holds employers accountable for torts committed by employees acting within the scope of their employment. context
  • Nevada's industrial insurance statutes govern workers' compensation claims, dispute resolutions, and vocational rehabilitation services. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Employers

Directly affected

Personal Injury Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs face new limits on recoverable medical expense damages and must account for the fault of nonparties in civil actions.

Directly affected

Injured Workers

Claimants under the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act are subject to a 20 percent cap on private attorney fees deducted from lump sum payments.

Directly affected

Private Attorneys

Attorneys representing industrial insurance claimants face statutory caps limiting their fees to 20 percent of lump sum awards.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an employer still be held liable for an employee's wrongful acts under this bill?
No. The bill amends NRS 41.130 to provide that only the person causing the injury is liable to the injured party, removing employer liability for employee conduct.
How are medical expense damages limited in personal injury cases?
Past and future medical expense damages are limited to amounts actually paid, insurance obligations, or up to 120 percent of Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement rates if the plaintiff lacks health insurance or is covered by Medicare/Medicaid.
Are attorney fees restricted in workers' compensation cases?
Yes. Private attorneys or representatives cannot receive fees exceeding 20 percent of any lump-sum payment awarded to a claimant under the specified industrial insurance provisions.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 12, 2025
    (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.)
  2. Mar 18, 2025Committee
    From printer. To committee.
  3. Mar 17, 2025Introduced
    Read first time. Referred to Committee on Judiciary. To printer.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Abolition of Employer Vicarious Liability

The legislation removes long-standing common law protections by shielding employers from liability for employee torts.

Connected Entities

Ira Hansen
PersonIra Hansen“Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 363”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.leg.state.nv.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy80
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record