POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Arizona HB 4038 prohibits public schools from starting the school year before September 1

Original title: public schools; first day; restriction

Last action · February 10, 2026: House Second ReadingSponsors: Beverly Pingerelli and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Arizona public and charter schools would be prohibited from starting their instructional year before September 1, beginning in the 2027-2028 school year.

Why it matters

Changes the calendar window for public school district and charter school operations, moving the earliest allowable start date of classes to September for families and educators.

Background
  • Beverly Pingerelli serves as a member of the Arizona House of Representatives. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Arizona school districts

School districts must adjust their academic calendars to ensure the first day of instruction does not occur before September 1 starting in the 2027-2028 school year.

Directly affected

Charter schools

Charter schools are prohibited from beginning instruction prior to September 1 beginning in the 2027-2028 school year.

Directly affected

Students

Students experience a standardized calendar shift preventing school years from starting before September 1.

Key Facts

  • Beginning in the 2027-2028 school year, the first day of instruction in any school year may not occur before September 1.
  • The school year begins July 1 and ends June 30.
  • A school month consists of twenty school days or four weeks of five days each.
  • School district governing boards or charter school governing bodies may adopt flexible instructional time models after holding at least two public hearings.
Show all 8 facts
  • Schools may deliver annual required instructional time through direct instruction, project-based learning, independent learning, or mastery-based learning.
  • Schools may provide up to forty percent of total instructional time in a remote setting without any impact to funding, starting in school year 2022-2023.
  • If a school exceeds the allowable remote instruction threshold, the department of education reduces funding for that excess percentage by ninety-five percent of the base support level.
  • The department of education must annually provide lists of schools and charter schools exceeding remote instruction limits to their respective state boards.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can schools still offer remote learning under this measure?
Yes, schools may provide up to forty percent of total instructional time in a remote setting without funding impacts, subject to reporting and potential online school application requirements if thresholds are exceeded.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the House floor.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 10, 2026HouseFloor
    House Second Reading
  2. Feb 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

State Board of Education, Beverly Pingerelli, Frank Carroll and 3 more
OrganizationState Board of Education“State board that determines online school status applications”Map →
PersonBeverly Pingerelli“Primary sponsor in the Arizona House”Map →
PersonFrank Carroll“Cosponsor”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Education“State agency responsible for funding calculations and reporting”Map →
OrganizationState Board for Charter Schools“State board for charter school online status determinations”Map →
PersonDavid Livingston“Cosponsor”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record