POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

The Royalty Transparency Act (Proposed Amendment)

Original title: Text of Senate Amendment 6117

Record date · June 24, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

This proposed amendment to the defense authorization bill would require federal employees and members of various government advisory committees to publicly disclose royalty payments received from inventions developed during their government service. It also mandates new oversight by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) regarding conflict-of-interest policies at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and requires federal agencies to include royalty reviews in their contractor vetting processes.

Why it matters

If enacted, this amendment would change the financial disclosure requirements for thousands of federal advisory committee members and executive branch employees, forcing the public disclosure of royalty income that is currently often shielded from public view.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Federal advisory committee members

They would be required to file financial disclosure reports and publicly report royalty income from government-developed inventions.

Directly affected

Executive branch employees

They must disclose the source and amount of royalties received from inventions developed during their government employment.

Directly affected

National Institutes of Health

The agency is subject to new GAO oversight and reporting requirements regarding its conflict-of-interest and recusal processes.

Directly affected

Federal contractors and grantees

They will be subject to new conflict-of-interest reviews that specifically include an assessment of royalty payments received in the preceding year.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who would be required to disclose their royalty income under this act?
Executive branch employees, s, and members of specific federal advisory committees, such as those advising on vaccines, cancer research, and biosecurity.
Can Members of Congress see these financial reports?
Yes, the act requires agencies to provide unredacted copies of financial disclosure reports to Members of Congress within 30 days of a request, excluding sensitive personal information like social security numbers.
Does this apply to all NIH peer reviewers?
No, there is an exception for members of s if the NIH Director certifies that the member has followed strict requirements for conflicts of interest.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Increased Congressional Oversight

The amendment significantly lowers the barrier for Congress to access executive branch financial disclosure reports by mandating a 30-day turnaround for unredacted copies.

Connected Entities

Mr. Paul, Office of Government Ethics, National Institutes of Health and 1 more
PersonMr. Paul“Senator who submitted the amendment.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Government Ethics“Consulted on reporting requirements for confidential financial disclosures.”Map →
OrganizationNational Institutes of Health“Subject to new GAO oversight regarding peer review conflict-of-interest processe”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Accountability Office“Tasked with auditing advisory committees and NIH conflict-of-interest compliance”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.govinfo.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance80
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record