POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Mississippi requires police pursuit policies and authorizes financial penalties for noncompliant local agencies

Original title: Law enforcement pursuits; require municipalities and counties to develop policies regarding.

Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (S) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Sollie Norwood

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

County sheriff departments and municipal police departments are required to develop and implement a written emergency vehicle response policy governing motor vehicle pursuits by December 31, 2025. Agencies that fail to adopt the required policy are ineligible for and face a ten percent withholding of state tax allocations and payments by the Department of Revenue.

Why it matters

Local governments risk losing ten percent of specific state shared revenues—such as gasoline taxes and municipal sales tax allocations—if their law enforcement agencies fail to establish compliant pursuit guidelines by the statutory deadline.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

County sheriff departments

County sheriff departments must adopt and implement a written motor vehicle pursuit policy meeting statutory criteria by December 31, 2025, file copies with the Department of Public Safety, and adhere to interjurisdictional rules or face funding withholding.

Directly affected

Municipal police departments

Municipal police departments must develop and implement a written emergency vehicle response policy by December 31, 2025, and comply with restrictions on pursuit initiation and interjurisdictional coordination.

Directly affected

Counties and municipalities

Boards of supervisors and municipal governing authorities are subject to a ten percent withholding of state-allocated payments and tax distributions if their local law enforcement agencies fail to adopt the mandated pursuit policy.

Directly affected

Office of Standards and Training of the Department of Public Safety

The office is charged with examining local records annually, determining compliance, issuing notices of noncompliance, and notifying the Department of Revenue and Attorney General.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a local law enforcement agency does not adopt a vehicle pursuit policy?
The agency becomes ineligible for , and the local county or municipality faces a ten percent withholding of specific state-administered tax allocations and payments by the Department of Revenue.
What criminal offenses allow a police officer to initiate a vehicle pursuit under the proposed rules?
Pursuits are prohibited for misdemeanors and general felonies, and are restricted exclusively to instances where the fleeing individual has allegedly committed carjacking, murder, aggravated assault, or robbery.
Can a police pursuit cross municipal or county boundaries?
Yes, but a pursuit may only proceed and continue into another political subdivision if a formal agreement exists between the jurisdictions establishing notification procedures and supervisory coordination.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026Senate
    02/03 (S) Died In Committee
  2. Jan 19, 2026SenateCommittee
    01/19 (S) Referred To Judiciary, Division B

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Enforcement of Local Police Policies via Revenue Withholding

The legislation utilizes existing municipal and county state-shared tax allocations (such as gasoline and sales tax distributions) as financial leverage to enforce compliance with standardized law enforcement policies.

Connected Entities

Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson County, Attorney General and 7 more
OrganizationMississippi Department of Transportation“State department receiving highway and fuel tax allocations”Map →
locationJackson County“County subject to specific surplus fund and bond provisions”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“State office receiving notice of noncompliance certificates”Map →
PersonState Treasurer“State official certifying bond and interest payments”Map →
locationHarrison County“County subject to specific surplus fund and bond provisions”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Standards and Training of the Department of Public Safety“State office responsible for examining compliance and issuing certificates of no”Map →
PersonSollie Norwood“Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 2326”Map →
OrganizationOffice of State Aid Road Construction“Special fund and office receiving dedicated road tax distributions”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Revenue“State department authorized to withhold allocations and payments from noncomplia”Map →
locationCity of Jackson“Municipality subject to specific sales tax diversions for the Capitol Complex Im”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record