POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Montana Legislature Proposes Adopting the Social Work Licensure Compact to Establish Multistate Practice

Original title: Adopting the social work licensure compact

Last action · May 23, 2025: (S) Died in ProcessSponsor: Emma Kerr-Carpenter

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 140 adopts the Social Work Licensure Compact, creating a multistate licensing system that allows social workers to practice across participating member states without obtaining individual licenses in each state. The measure establishes eligibility requirements, background check procedures, rulemaking authority for a joint commission, and disciplinary frameworks.

Why it matters

Changes licensing structures and mobility for clinical, master's, and bachelor's social workers by enabling multistate practice under a single home-state license, subject to remote-state laws and rules.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

regulated social workers

Social workers gain the ability to obtain a multistate license allowing practice across member states without acquiring individual state licenses, while remaining subject to remote-state laws and compact disciplinary rules.

Directly affected

licensing authorities

State boards and licensing agencies must participate in the commission's data system, report adverse actions, conduct criminal background checks, and recognize multistate licenses issued by other member states.

Directly affected

active military members and their spouses

Service members and their spouses holding a multistate license may retain their home state designation throughout active duty service.

Key Facts

  • The Social Work Licensure Compact creates a multistate licensing framework allowing qualified social workers to practice in all member states.
  • Applicants for a clinical-category multistate license must attain a master's degree in social work and complete a minimum of 3,000 hours or 2 years of postgraduate supervised clinical practice.
  • Applicants must submit fingerprints or biometric data for criminal history record checks through the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
  • The Social Work Licensure Compact Commission is established as a joint government agency and instrumentality of member states with rulemaking authority.
Show all 8 facts
  • A coordinated data system is established to track licensee information, adverse actions, and current significant investigative information.
  • Active military members and their spouses holding a multistate license may retain their home state designation while the service member is on active duty.
  • Only the licensee's home state has the power to take adverse action against a multistate license, while remote states may remove multistate authorization to practice within their borders.
  • The compact becomes effective on the date the statute is enacted into law in the seventh member state.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible for a multistate social work license under this compact?
Applicants must hold an active, unencumbered license in their home state, pay applicable fees, submit biometric data for criminal history checks, meet continuing competence requirements, and fulfill education and supervised practice requirements corresponding to their licensure category.
Can a remote state discipline a social worker practicing under a multistate license?
Yes. A remote state has the authority to remove a regulated social worker's multistate authorization to practice within that specific state, impose fines, and take actions necessary to protect public health and safety in accordance with due process.
How does the compact affect active military personnel and their families?
Active military members or their spouses may designate a home state where they hold a and retain that home state designation during the period the service member is on active duty.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

20 actions
  1. May 23, 2025Senate
    (S) Died in Process
  2. Mar 12, 2025Senate
    (S) Missed Deadline for General Bill Transmittal
  3. Feb 28, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Taken from Table in Committee
  4. Feb 5, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Tabled in Committee
  5. Jan 30, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Printed
  6. Jan 30, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Signed
Show 14 earlier actions
  1. Jan 30, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Received
  2. Jan 24, 2025Senate
    (S) Fiscal Note Requested
  3. Jan 23, 2025Senate
    (S) Hearing
  4. Jan 15, 2025SenateCommittee
    (S) Referred to Committee
  5. Jan 15, 2025Senate
    (S) 1st Reading
  6. Jan 14, 2025SenateIntroduced
    (S) Introduced
  7. Jan 14, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Delivered to Requester
  8. Jan 6, 2025House
    (LC) Draft Ready for Delivery
  9. Jan 3, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Assembly
  10. Jan 2, 2025House
    (LC) Draft in Final Drafter Review
  11. Dec 30, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Input/Proofing
  12. Dec 20, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Edit
  13. Dec 19, 2024House
    (LC) Draft in Legal Review
  14. Oct 30, 2024House
    (LC) Drafter Assigned

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Transition from Single-State to Multistate Licensing

The measure establishes a framework replacing single-state licensing requirements with mutual recognition across participating member states.

Connected Entities

Council for Higher Education Accreditation, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Education and 1 more
OrganizationCouncil for Higher Education Accreditation“Accrediting agency recognized for social work educational programs.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation“Agency responsible for conducting criminal history record checks based on applic”Map →
OrganizationU.S. Department of Education“Federal department recognized for accrediting agency oversight.”Map →
PersonEmma Kerr-Carpenter“Democratic legislator from District 23 who introduced Senate Bill 140.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

bills.legmt.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record