POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Michigan bill grants immunity from nuisance and taking claims to racetracks against later-arriving neighbors

Original title: Civil procedure: other; racing facilities and racetracks; provide immunity from nuisance claims.

Last action · January 29, 2026: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY AFFAIRSSponsors: Roger Hauck and 7 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Michigan Senate Bill 773 prohibits property owners from filing , , or similar legal claims against a nearby racing facility if the racetrack was built before the property owner acquired or improved their land. The immunity applies regardless of subsequent lawful changes to the track's size, scope, or type of racing, provided the facility remains subject to state and federal environmental and health safety laws.

Why it matters

Property owners living within a 5-mile radius of a racetrack lose the legal right to sue the facility for or property if they moved into the area after the racetrack was already established.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Owners and operators of racing facilities and racetracks

Receive legal immunity from nuisance, taking, or other claims brought by property owners who acquired or improved their land after the racetrack was built.

Directly affected

Owners and occupants of real property near racing facilities

Lose the right to bring nuisance, taking, or other legal actions against nearby racing facilities if they acquired or improved their property after the facility was established.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue a racetrack near my house if it expands or changes its racing type?
No, the immunity applies even if the racetrack makes lawful changes to its size, scope, configuration, technology, or the type of racing conducted, provided the facility existed before you acquired or improved your property.
Does this bill exempt racetracks from environmental or safety regulations?
No, the legislation explicitly states it does not exempt racing facilities from compliance with state or federal environmental laws or health and safety regulations.
How close does a property have to be to a racetrack for this immunity to apply?
The bill applies to real property located within a 5-mile radius of the perimeter of the property or contiguous group of properties where the racing facility or racetrack is located.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 29, 2026SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY AFFAIRS
  2. Jan 29, 2026SenateIntroduced
    INTRODUCED BY SENATOR ROGER HAUCK

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Michigan, Revised judicature act of 1961
locationMichigan“State where the legislation applies”Map →
otherRevised judicature act of 1961“Act being amended by the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record