The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Utah directs division study on agricultural water diversions and non-agricultural use
Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Doug Owens
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
Utah requires the Division of Water Resources and Division of Water Rights to study statewide water diversions classified as agricultural, reporting findings on diversion counts and non-agricultural usage to an interim committee by November 30, 2026.
State agencies face new reporting mandates to inventory agricultural water classifications, affecting how water tracking and optimization data are delivered to legislative committees starting May 6, 2026.
- The Agricultural Water Optimization Committee oversees research, grants, and programs designed to improve agricultural water use efficiency in Utah. context
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Division of Water Resources
Must conduct a statewide study on agricultural water diversions, compile annual reports, and report findings to the interim committee before November 30, 2026.
Division of Water Rights
Must coordinate with the Division of Water Resources to study water diversions and jointly present annual reports to legislative commissions and councils.
Agricultural industry
Subject to water diversion classifications, reporting requirements, and optimization grant rules overseen by the committee and state divisions.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the study on agricultural water diversions require state agencies to determine?
When is the study report due and to whom must it be delivered?
Does the bill appropriate any money?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.
Procedural history
15 actions- Mar 6, 2026HouseHouse/ filed
- Mar 6, 2026HouseHouse/ strike enacting clause
- Mar 5, 2026HouseHouse/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
- Mar 2, 2026HouseHouse Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
- Feb 11, 2026HouseHouse Comm - Held
- Feb 9, 2026HouseCommitteeHouse/ to standing committee
Show 9 earlier actions
- Feb 6, 2026HouseHouse/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
- Feb 6, 2026ReleasedLFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0490
- Feb 6, 2026Version SponsorLFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0490
- Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroducedHouse/ 1st reading (Introduced)
- Feb 4, 2026HouseHouse/ received bill from Legislative Research
- Feb 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal AgencyLFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0490
- Feb 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal AnalystLFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0490
- Feb 4, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselNumbered Bill Publicly Distributed
- Feb 4, 2026Legislative Research and General CounselBill Numbered but not Distributed
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
New Agricultural Diversion Study Mandate
The legislation introduces a targeted study specifically examining whether water classified as agricultural is being diverted for non-agricultural purposes.
Connected Entities
Sources
le.utah.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz20Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
