The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.North Carolina bans PFAS firefighting foam for training and restricts testing
Last action · April 30, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate (Senate action)Sponsors: Ted Davis and 60 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
North Carolina prohibits persons, local governments, and State agencies from discharging containing intentionally added for training or practice purposes starting December 1, 2025. Discharging such foam for testing is also banned unless required by law or an authority having jurisdiction and the testing facility uses containment, treatment, and disposal measures to prevent environmental release.
Firefighters, local governments, and testing facilities must shift to non-fluorinated training foams like and implement containment measures for testing, reducing chemical exposure and drinking water contamination starting December 1, 2025.
- Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of synthetic chemicals widely used in industrial applications and firefighting foams that persist in the environment and accumulate in drinking water sources. context
- Aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS has historically been utilized extensively for extinguishing flammable liquid and petroleum fires. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
local governments
Local governments and agencies are prohibited from discharging PFAS-containing Class B foam for training and must adopt non-fluorinated alternatives and containment measures for testing.
State agencies
State agencies must comply with the prohibition on discharging PFAS-containing Class B foam during training and practice.
firefighters
Firefighters will use non-fluorinated training foams and experience reduced exposure to PFAS contamination during training exercises.
testing facilities
Testing facilities must implement containment, treatment, and disposal measures if they discharge PFAS-containing Class B foam for testing purposes.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does the ban on using PFAS firefighting foam for training take effect?
Can Class B firefighting foam with PFAS still be used for testing?
What alternatives must be used for firefighter training?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.
Procedural history
16 actions- Apr 30, 2025SenateRef To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
- Apr 30, 2025SenatePassed 1st Reading
- Apr 30, 2025SenateRegular Message Received From House
- Apr 30, 2025HouseRegular Message Sent To Senate
- Apr 29, 2025HousePassed 3rd Reading
- Apr 29, 2025HousePassed 2nd Reading
Show 10 earlier actions
- Apr 28, 2025HousePlaced On Cal For 04/29/2025
- Apr 28, 2025HouseCal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
- Apr 28, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Apr 16, 2025HouseRe-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Apr 16, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Apr 9, 2025HouseRe-ref Com On Agriculture and Environment
- Apr 9, 2025HouseReptd Fav
- Apr 1, 2025HouseRef to the Com on Emergency Management and Disaster Recovery, if favorable, Agriculture and Environment, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
- Apr 1, 2025HousePassed 1st Reading
- Mar 27, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 56 more sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.ncleg.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy35Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
