POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut requires Office of Policy and Management to study state agency FOIA response times by January 2027

Original title: AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF STATE AGENCY RESPONSE TIMES TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS.

Last action · April 1, 2026: File Number 289Sponsors: Rob Sampson and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management must conduct a study on state agency response times for public records requests and submit a findings report to the General Assembly by January 15, 2027.

Why it matters

Allocates up to $300,000 in 2027 for a consultant to analyze public record response delays and complaints across state agencies.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Office of Policy and Management

The Office of Policy and Management must conduct the study, hire a consultant, and submit a report by January 15, 2027.

Directly affected

state agencies

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Office of Policy and Management required to do under this bill?
The Office of Policy and Management must conduct a study of state agency response times to public records requests and submit a report of its findings by January 15, 2027.
When is the report due to the General Assembly?
The report is due no later than January 15, 2027.
What is the estimated fiscal impact of the study?
The study results in a one-time General Fund cost to the Office of Policy and Management of up to $300,000 in FY 27.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

9 actions
  1. Apr 1, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 289
  2. Apr 1, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 200
  3. Apr 1, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  4. Apr 1, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Mar 26, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26 5:00 PM
  6. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 3 earlier actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  2. Feb 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 02/24
  3. Feb 19, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Government Oversight

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Freedom of Information Commission, General Assembly, Office of Policy and Management
OrganizationFreedom of Information Commission“Receives complaints regarding unreasonable response times to public records requ”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Recipient of the study report via its joint standing committee having cognizance”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Policy and Management“Required to conduct a study of state agency FOIA response times and submit a rep”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 35)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record