Permanent Protection for Aquaculture Business Records
March 30, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Current status: signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
This change prevents the automatic public disclosure of proprietary aquaculture business data that would have otherwise occurred on October 2, 2026, if the exemption had been allowed to expire.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Aquaculture business owners
Their business records held by the state remain exempt from public disclosure requirements indefinitely.
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
The department continues to maintain the confidentiality of specific aquaculture records as mandated by the amended statute.
Current stage: signed.
Next step not available in the current record.
Summary
Why It Matters
This change prevents the automatic public disclosure of proprietary aquaculture business data that would have otherwise occurred on October 2, 2026, if the exemption had been allowed to expire.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this law change?
Will my aquaculture business records become public now?
News Coverage
Voting Record
Third Reading
Total
39
Yes
33
No
3
Present
0
Not Voting
2
Abstain
0
How they voted (39)
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Erin Grall
Republican · yes
Joe Gruters
Republican · excused
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · no
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Barbara Sharief
Democratic · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Mack Bernard
Democratic · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · no
Shev Jones
Democratic · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
+ 15 more
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
109
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
8
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
David Borrero
Republican · yes
Rachel Plakon
Republican · yes
Dana Trabulsy
Republican · yes
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · yes
Toby Overdorf
Republican · yes
Gallop Franklin
Democratic · not voting
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Fentrice Driskell
Democratic · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · yes
Robbie Brackett
Republican · yes
Mike Redondo
Republican · yes
Tyler Sirois
Republican · yes
Peggy Gossett-Seidman
Republican · yes
Omar Blanco
Republican · yes
Judson Sapp
Republican · yes
Jessica Baker
Republican · yes
Danny Alvarez
Republican · yes
Taylor Yarkosky
Republican · yes
+ 93 more
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Removal of Sunset Provision
The legislature transitioned a temporary public records exemption into a permanent one, indicating a settled policy preference for keeping these specific aquaculture records confidential.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance40How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools