POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah Requires State Licenses and Certifications for Carbon Dioxide System Servicing

Original title: Carbon Dioxide System Amendments

Last action · March 24, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Hoang Nguyen and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Starting January 1, 2027, Utah requires businesses that service s with a capacity of 100 pounds or more to hold a license from the state fire marshal, and individual technicians to hold a certification. The Utah Fire Prevention Board must establish the licensing, certification, application, and fee rules, while the bill takes effect generally on May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

Commercial and industrial operators utilizing large s must incur new licensing and training compliance costs to employ certified personnel for system maintenance and installation.

Background
  • The Utah Fire Prevention Board operates within the state government to establish fire safety standards and codes across public and commercial buildings. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Carbon dioxide system service businesses

Businesses must obtain a state license from the state fire marshal starting January 1, 2027, to engage in servicing carbon dioxide systems.

Directly affected

Technicians servicing carbon dioxide systems

Individual technicians must secure certification from the state fire marshal to service qualifying carbon dioxide systems.

Directly affected

Utah Fire Prevention Board

The board is required to establish rules, application forms, and fees for carbon dioxide system licensing and certification.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as a carbon dioxide system under this law?
A is defined as a system that stores, uses, or dispenses carbon dioxide and has a capacity of 100 pounds or more, including associated appliances, pipes, tubing, fittings, required signage, and gas detection equipment.
Who is exempt from needing an individual certification to service these systems?
s and individuals in training who have not worked for more than 45 business days and are supervised by a certified individual are exempt from the individual certification requirement.
When do the licensing and certification requirements take effect?
The requirement to hold a license or certification to service s takes effect on January 1, 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

39 actions
  1. Mar 24, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 12, 2026House
    House/ to Governor
  3. Mar 12, 2026House
    House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 11, 2026House
    House/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 11, 2026Clerk of the House
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 33 earlier actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from House for Enrolling
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
  3. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  4. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  5. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
  6. Mar 6, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
  7. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
  8. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ Rules to 2nd Reading Calendar
  9. Mar 4, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules
  10. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  11. Feb 26, 2026Senate
    Senate/ committee report favorable
  12. Feb 25, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  13. Feb 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  14. Feb 18, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  15. Feb 18, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  16. Feb 18, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  17. Feb 18, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  18. Feb 18, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  19. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  20. Feb 10, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ amended
  21. Feb 9, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  22. Feb 9, 2026House
    House Comm - Amendment Recommendation
  23. Feb 6, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  24. Feb 5, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  25. Feb 5, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0240
  26. Feb 4, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0240
  27. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  28. Jan 17, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0240
  29. Jan 14, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  30. Jan 13, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0240
  31. Jan 13, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0240
  32. Jan 13, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  33. Jan 13, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Show 4 earlier roll calls
Outcome not reportedHouse2/18/2026Utah LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

House/ passed 3rd reading

Total

72

Yes
44
No
23
Present
0
Not voting
5
Abstain
0

How they voted (72)

48 more members
Ashlee MatthewsParty not recordedyes
Walt BrooksParty not recordedabsent
Paul CutlerParty not recordedyes
Jon HawkinsParty not recordedno
Ryan WilcoxParty not recordedno
Sahara HayesParty not recordedyes
Tom PetersonParty not recordedyes
Cheryl ActonParty not recordedyes
Mike SchultzParty not recordedno
Doug WeltonParty not recordedyes
Candice PierucciParty not recordedno
Doug FiefiaParty not recordedno
Stephanie GriciusParty not recordedno
Jason KyleParty not recordedno
Norm ThurstonParty not recordedabsent
Hoang NguyenParty not recordedyes
Mike KohlerParty not recordedyes
Clint OkerlundParty not recordedyes
Cal RobertsParty not recordedyes
Mike PetersenParty not recordedno
Sandra HollinsParty not recordedyes
Colin JackParty not recordedyes
Kay ChristoffersonParty not recordedno
Nicholeen PeckParty not recordedno
Ken IvoryParty not recordedno
Tiara AuxierParty not recordedno
Matt MacPhersonParty not recordedno
Trevor LeeParty not recordedno
Ray WardParty not recordedyes
Carol MossParty not recordedyes
Jim DunniganParty not recordedyes
Ariel DefayParty not recordedyes
Leah HansenParty not recordedno
Jill KofordParty not recordedno
Troy ShelleyParty not recordedyes
Casey SniderParty not recordedno
Jake FitisemanuParty not recordedyes
Steve EliasonParty not recordedyes
Joseph ElisonParty not recordedyes
Rex ShippParty not recordedyes
Karen PetersonParty not recordedyes
Jake SawyerParty not recordedyes
Kristen ChevrierParty not recordedabsent
Doug OwensParty not recordedyes
Lisa ShepherdParty not recordedno
Logan MonsonParty not recordedyes
Cory MaloyParty not recordedyes
Jason ThompsonParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of State Fire Marshal Oversight

The legislation expands the regulatory scope of the Utah Fire Prevention Board and state fire marshal into specific carbon dioxide system servicing for the first time.

Connected Entities

Uniform Building Code Commission, state fire marshal, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and 6 more
OrganizationUniform Building Code Commission“Joint creator of the Unified Code Analysis Council”Map →
Organizationstate fire marshal“State official issuing licenses and certifications”Map →
OrganizationBureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives“Federal agency considered in explosive rules”Map →
OrganizationBusiness and Labor Interim Committee“Receives written reports from the board”Map →
PersonHoang Nguyen“Chief Sponsor in the House”Map →
PersonDerrin R. Owens“Senate Sponsor”Map →
OrganizationUtah Valley University“Operates fire and rescue training program”Map →
OrganizationUtah Fire Prevention Board“State board tasked with establishing rules and certification criteria”Map →
OrganizationUnified Code Analysis Council“Council created jointly by board and commission”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record