POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

Michigan HB 4697 modifies eligibility rules and background check requirements for guardianship assistance payments

Original title: Children: guardians; eligibility for guardianship assistance payments; modify.

Last action · May 20, 2026: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLESponsors: Stephanie Young and 27 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Michigan HB 4697 updates the eligibility criteria and approval processes for prospective guardians to receive guardianship assistance payments on behalf of eligible children. The bill establishes mandatory criminal and background checks for prospective guardians, s, and all adults living in the home, while clarifying funding distinctions between federal and state-funded assistance.

Why it matters

Changes the legal standards and background screening mandates required for prospective and s seeking state or federal financial support for child placement.

Background
  • The Guardianship Assistance Act governs financial assistance provided to eligible individuals who become legal guardians of children leaving the foster care system. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Prospective guardians

Prospective guardians must satisfy updated residency and background check requirements to be approved for guardianship assistance payments.

Directly affected

Successor guardians

Successor guardians are subject to mandatory background and central registry checks and must meet eligibility criteria to receive assistance payments.

Directly affected

Eligible children

Eligible children and their non-eligible siblings may be placed in approved relative guardianship arrangements with assistance payments authorized on their behalf.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the residency requirement for a prospective guardian to qualify for assistance?
The eligible child must have resided with the prospective guardian in their residence for a minimum of 6 months before the application for guardianship assistance is received by the department.
Who must undergo a background check under this bill?
Criminal record checks and child abuse and child neglect checks are required for the prospective guardian, all s, and all adults living in the guardian's or successor guardian's home, including fingerprint submissions to the state police and FBI.
What happens if an eligible child has a sibling who is not eligible for Title IV-E assistance?
The child and their sibling may be placed in the same relative guardianship arrangement, and -funded relative guardianship assistance payments may be paid on behalf of each sibling if agreed upon by the department and the relative.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. May 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
  2. May 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    REPORTED FAVORABLY WITHOUT AMENDMENT 5/19/2026
  3. Apr 21, 2026SenateCommittee
    REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND HUMAN SERVICES
  4. Apr 21, 2026SenateFloor
    PASSED BY HOUSE WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT
  5. Apr 16, 2026House
    transmitted
  6. Apr 16, 2026HouseFloor
    passed; given immediate effect Roll Call #114 Yeas 101 Nays 3 Excused 0 Not Voting 6
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. Apr 16, 2026HouseFloor
    read a third time
  2. Apr 15, 2026House
    placed on third reading
  3. Apr 15, 2026HouseFloor
    read a second time
  4. Feb 24, 2026House
    referred to second reading
  5. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    reported with recommendation without amendment
  6. Jul 1, 2025House
    bill electronically reproduced 06/26/2025
  7. Jun 26, 2025HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Families and Veterans
  8. Jun 26, 2025HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  9. Jun 26, 2025HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Stephanie Young

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Show 23 more sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference100% confidence

Conditional Enactment Requirement

The bill explicitly links its enactment to the passage of either a specific Senate bill or House Bill No. 4696.

Connected Entities

Sharon MacDonell, Department of State Police, Matt Longjohn and 10 more
PersonSharon MacDonell“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of State Police“Receives fingerprints for criminal history checks”Map →
PersonMatt Longjohn“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLuke Meerman“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonStephanie Young“Primary sponsor of House Bill 4697”Map →
PersonMatt Koleszar“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation“Performs federal criminal history checks via fingerprint submission”Map →
PersonHelena Scott“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCarrie Rheingans“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMai Xiong“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonMike McFall“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonKara Hope“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonTyrone Carter“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record