POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Chip EQUIP Act of 2024

Record date · June 18, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill prohibits companies that receive federal semiconductor funding from using that money to purchase specific types of manufacturing equipment made by foreign entities of concern. It establishes strict definitions for 'ineligible equipment' and creates a waiver process for cases where such equipment is unavailable from U.S. or allied sources or is deemed necessary for national security.

Why it matters

Companies receiving federal semiconductor subsidies will face new restrictions on their supply chains, potentially impacting their procurement costs and equipment sourcing strategies to ensure compliance with national security standards.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Semiconductor manufacturers receiving federal funds

These companies must adhere to new procurement restrictions on manufacturing equipment or risk violating their federal assistance agreements.

Directly affected

Foreign semiconductor equipment manufacturers

These entities are designated as sources of 'ineligible equipment,' which may limit their ability to sell to U.S.-subsidized semiconductor projects.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What equipment is considered 'ineligible' under this bill?
Ineligible equipment refers to fully assembled semiconductor manufacturing tools, such as lithography, etching, and , produced by foreign entities of concern.
Can a company ever use this restricted equipment?
Yes, the Secretary may grant a waiver if the equipment is unavailable from U.S. or allied sources, or if the use complies with export regulations and is deemed in the national security interest.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

9901, Kelly, Mr., Mrs. Blackburn and 6 more
bill number9901“Section of the National Defense Authorization Act”Map →
PersonKelly, Mr.“Introducer of the bill”Map →
PersonMrs. Blackburn“Co-sponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of Defense“Consulted in waiver decisions”Map →
bill number9907“Section of the National Defense Authorization Act”Map →
otherExport Administration Regulations“Regulations governing export controls”Map →
PersonThornberry, William M. (Mac)“Name of the National Defense Authorization Act”Map →
OrganizationNational Intelligence, Director“Consulted in waiver decisions”Map →
bill number9902“Section of the National Defense Authorization Act”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record