The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Wisconsin SB 732 Restructures CPA Licensure Pathways, Experience, and Exam Rules
Last action · March 23, 2026: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1Sponsors: Howard Marklein and 5 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
This bill restructures the requirements for obtaining a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) certificate by establishing alternative pathways combining degrees, coursework, and verified work experience, while also altering examination eligibility and out-of-state practice privileges.
Changes the educational and work experience criteria candidates must fulfill to sit for the CPA exam and earn a license in Wisconsin, affecting prospective accountants and out-of-state practitioners seeking practice privileges.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Certified Public Accountant candidates
Must navigate new educational, examination, and work experience requirements to obtain licensure.
Accounting Examining Board
Responsible for judging the sufficiency of candidate work experience and enforcing modified administrative rules.
Out-of-state CPA practitioners
Subject to revised criteria for practicing in Wisconsin without a local license based on substantial equivalence.
Key Facts
- The bill creates distinct educational and work experience pathways for obtaining a CPA certificate depending on whether an applicant receives a master's degree or a bachelor's degree.
- Candidates may sit for the CPA examination after receiving a bachelor's degree or completing at least 120 semester hours of education with required accounting and business coursework.
- Work experience required for licensure must involve services using accounting, attest, compilation, management advisory, financial advisory, tax, or consulting skills, and must be verified.
- Out-of-state CPA certificate holders wishing to practice in Wisconsin must meet requirements similar to Wisconsin standards rather than relying on third-party verification services.
Show all 6 facts
- Candidates must pass all sections of the uniform CPA examination within a rolling 30-month period.
- Continuing professional development renewal requirements are adjusted to reference a 3-year period.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the new pathways to obtain a CPA certificate under the bill?
When is a person eligible to take the CPA examination?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Failed in the Senate.
Procedural history
12 actions- Mar 23, 2026SenateFailed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Feb 11, 2026SenateLaid on table
- Feb 9, 2026SenatePlaced on calendar 2-11-2026 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 4, 2026SenateAvailable for scheduling
- Feb 4, 2026SenateFloorReport passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 4, 2026SenateExecutive action taken
Show 6 earlier actions
- Jan 27, 2026SenatePublic hearing held
- Jan 26, 2026SenateSenator Drake added as a coauthor
- Jan 20, 2026SenateRepresentative Penterman added as a cosponsor
- Dec 15, 2025SenateRepresentative Ortiz-Velez added as a cosponsor
- Dec 10, 2025SenateIntroducedRead first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs
- Dec 10, 2025SenateIntroducedIntroduced by Senator Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Wittke, Dittrich, Knodl, Prado and Wichgers
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 1 more sponsor
Connected Entities
Sources
docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance20Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
- Controversy10Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz15Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
