POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofLabor →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

New Jersey bill requires E-verify use for new hires and establishes graduated fines for employing unauthorized workers

Original title: "New Jersey Jobs Protection Act"; requires verification of employment.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Labor CommitteeSponsors: Dawn Fantasia and 2 others

Companion · S 1689same policy, Senate version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

New Jersey employers are prohibited from intentionally or knowingly employing s and must verify each new employee's eligibility through the program within 90 days of hiring after December 31, 2011. The bill establishes progressive monetary penalties and probationary periods for employers who violate these requirements. Complaints are investigated by the Attorney General or county prosecutors, who must rely on federal determinations for work authorization status.

Why it matters

Employers face escalating fines ranging from $10,000 to $30,000 per unauthorized worker alongside multi-year probationary periods and mandatory quarterly reporting, while being required to implement the federal system for all new hires.

Background
  • The General Assembly is the lower house of the New Jersey Legislature. context
  • E-verify is a web-based system operated by the federal government that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

New Jersey employers

Employers must verify new hires using E-verify after December 31, 2011, and face escalating financial penalties and probationary oversight for employing unauthorized workers.

Directly affected

Unauthorized aliens

Workers lacking legal authorization under federal law to work are subject to employment termination upon findings of violations.

Directly affected

Attorney General and county prosecutors

State and county law enforcement officials are tasked with investigating complaints, notifying federal authorities, and bringing legal actions against violating employers.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do employers have to start using E-verify under this bill?
After December 31, 2011, every employer must verify the employment eligibility of an employee through the program within 90 days of the date of hire.
What are the penalties for a first-time violation?
For a first knowing violation, the court orders the employer to terminate unauthorized workers, subjects them to a three-year probationary period with quarterly reports, and requires a penalty of $10,000 for each employed.
Can state or local officials independently decide if an employee is authorized to work?
No. A state, county, or local official shall not attempt to independently make a final determination as to whether an alien is authorized to work in the United States, and work authorization must be verified with the federal government pursuant to 8 U.S.C. s.1373(c).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Labor Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Mandatory E-verify Transition

The bill shifts from optional employer use of E-verify to a mandatory verification requirement within 90 days of hire starting in late 2011.

Connected Entities

Michael Inganamort, Social Security Administration, United States Department of Homeland Security and 2 more
PersonMichael Inganamort“Assemblyman, District 24”Map →
OrganizationSocial Security Administration“Jointly administers E-verify”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Homeland Security“Jointly administers E-verify”Map →
PersonGregory P. McGuckin“Assemblyman and co-sponsor”Map →
PersonDawn Fantasia“Assemblywoman, District 24”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy85
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record