POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Proven Forest Management Act of 2022

Record date · December 18, 2024

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill directs federal agencies to coordinate with local stakeholders when managing National Forest System lands and allows certain fuel-reduction projects to bypass standard environmental review processes. It mandates that forest management activities aim for multiple ecosystem benefits, such as reducing fire risks and improving water quality, unless costs are deemed excessive.

Why it matters

The bill changes the regulatory requirements for forest management by allowing projects up to 10,000 acres to proceed without a full environmental impact study under the National Environmental Policy Act, provided they meet specific coordination and planning criteria.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Local governments

The bill mandates that the Secretary must coordinate with local government representatives when developing forest management activities.

Directly affected

Secretary of Agriculture

The Secretary is tasked with new coordination requirements and the authority to enter into cooperative agreements for land management.

Directly affected

Secretary of the Interior

The Secretary is tasked with new coordination requirements and the authority to enter into cooperative agreements for public lands.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this bill remove all environmental oversight for forest projects?
No. It provides a '' from NEPA for specific fuel-reduction projects under 10,000 acres, but these projects must still be consistent with existing forest plans and developed in coordination with local stakeholders.
Who is considered an 'impacted party' under this bill?
The bill specifically mentions local government representatives like county supervisors or commissioners, as well as 'interested entities' including NOAA, tribal governments, and local fire departments.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

Local fire departments, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, State and local governments and 8 more
OrganizationLocal fire departments“Listed as an 'interested entity' for consultation purposes.”Map →
OrganizationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration“Listed as an 'interested entity' for consultation purposes.”Map →
OrganizationState and local governments“Listed as an 'interested entity' for consultation purposes.”Map →
PersonMr. Stauber“Co-sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.”Map →
PersonMr. Moylan“Co-sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.”Map →
OrganizationCounty Supervisors or County Commissioners“Specifically named as impacted parties to coordinate with.”Map →
PersonMr. McClintock“Lead sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.”Map →
PersonMr. LaMalfa“Co-sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.”Map →
OrganizationSecretary concerned“The U.S. Secretary of the Interior, responsible for implementing the bill's prov”Map →
PersonMr. Valadao“Co-sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives.”Map →
OrganizationOregon and California Railroad“Reference to Coos Bay Wagon Road Grant lands.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.congress.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record