POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho establishes licensure framework, Board of Autonomous Medical Practice, and regulatory sandbox for artificial intelligence medical services

Original title: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MEDICAL SERVICES – Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding artifical intelligence medical services.

Last action · March 25, 2026: Reported Printed and Referred to Business

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Idaho creates a new class of health care provider for artificial intelligence systems and establishes the Board of Autonomous Medical Practice to regulate clinical AI services effective July 1, 2026. The legislation defines operational autonomy tiers, sets up a provisional framework, establishes professional duties of loyalty, and directs state insurance and health agencies to develop reimbursement standards.

Why it matters

The measure introduces state-level licensing for software and automated medical systems, establishing specific legal liabilities, mandatory data retention rules, and clinical practice standards for software providers operating within Idaho.

Background
  • State legislatures are increasingly examining regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence applications in clinical settings to address patient safety, liability, and software integration. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Artificial intelligence augmented and autonomous service providers

Entities operating clinical AI services must obtain state licensure, comply with data retention and transparency mandates, and maintain professional liability insurance and surety bonds.

Directly affected

Licensed human health care providers

Providers retain independent professional judgment and supervisory roles when interacting with advisory or supervised clinical AI services, without changes to their human scope of practice.

Directly affected

Patients receiving clinical AI services

Patients receive explicit disclosures regarding the use of AI systems, gain access to designated high-need care pathways, and retain rights to request human review or alternative care.

Directly affected

Health insurance carriers

Carriers are subject to upcoming Department of Insurance rules clarifying provider type recognition, billing mechanisms, and network inclusion standards for licensed AAASPs.

Key Facts

  • Establishes Chapter 60, Title 54, Idaho Code, known as the 'AI Medical Services Act,' taking effect on July 1, 2026.
  • Creates the Board of Autonomous Medical Practice consisting of eleven voting members appointed by the governor within the division of occupational and professional licenses.
  • Defines 'artificial intelligence augmented and autonomous service provider' (AAASP) as a corporate or legal entity licensed by the board to operate clinical AI services.
  • Establishes base license classes including Class A (state clinical service), Class B (federal device reciprocity service), and Class C (therapeutic and support service), alongside autonomy modifiers ranging from voluntary/exempt to fully autonomous.
Show all 10 facts
  • Requires all initial AAASP licenses to be provisional for a period of up to two years operating within a regulatory sandbox.
  • Mandates that AAASPs operating under modifier L2 or L3 be bound by a professional duty of loyalty to the patient, prohibiting paid commercial advertisements within clinical spaces and unlawful steering to affiliates.
  • Requires every AAASP to maintain an immutable clinical logic snapshot for every deployed version of its algorithm for a period of two years for audit purposes.
  • Mandates that applicants submit proof of professional liability insurance, state and federal criminal background checks for key personnel, and a surety bond of at least $50,000 payable to the state consumer protection fund.
  • Requires every applicant to submit an approved wind-down and continuity plan designating a successor data custodian and requiring data transfer within 72 hours in a triggering event.
  • Directs the Department of Insurance to issue formal guidance, bulletins, or rules no later than July 1, 2027, clarifying the application of insurance codes to licensed AAASPs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an AI-augmented and autonomous service provider (AAASP)?
An is a corporate or legal entity licensed by the Board of Autonomous Medical Practice to operate clinical artificial intelligence services.
Are all artificial intelligence systems required to obtain an AAASP license?
No, informational AI systems, advisory AI applied to preventive, chronic, or noncritical conditions, and certain supervised autonomous AI applied strictly to preventive conditions without issuing patient-specific orders are exempt from licensure.
What disclosures must be made to patients before receiving care from an autonomous AI provider?
Patients receiving care from a fully autonomous AI provider (modifier L3) must receive and affirmatively acknowledge a disclosure stating that the provider is an artificial intelligence system without routine human clinical oversight and that they may seek alternative care from a human provider at any time.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Mar 25, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed and Referred to Business
  2. Mar 25, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, read first time, referred to JRA for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift99% confidence

Creation of Non-Human Health Care Provider Class

The bill creates a novel legal classification permitting corporate and software entities to be recognized as health care providers under state law for privacy and credentialing purposes.

Connected Entities

Board of Autonomous Medical Practice, Department of Insurance, Department of Health and Welfare and 1 more
OrganizationBoard of Autonomous Medical Practice“Newly established board in the division of occupational and professional license”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Insurance“Required to issue formal guidance, bulletins, or rules clarifying insurance code”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Health and Welfare“Collaborates with the board to develop reimbursement codes, pilot programs, or c”Map →
OrganizationWays and Means Committee“Committee in the House of Representatives that introduced House Bill No. 945.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record