POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Maryland Bill SB 908 Restricts Solitary Confinement and Protects Vulnerable Inmates

Original title: Correctional Services - Restrictive Housing

Last action · February 12, 2026: Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m.Sponsor: Sara Love

Companion · HB 1154same policy, House version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Senate Bill 908 redefines in Maryland correctional facilities as placement in a locked room for 20 hours or more per day, caps consecutive stays at 15 days, and completely prohibits placing vulnerable populations in solitary confinement starting October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

The measure establishes strict limits on solitary confinement and time spent outside cells across state correctional facilities, directly affecting the daily conditions and health monitoring for individuals in custody.

Background
  • Senate Bill 908 was introduced in the Maryland Senate during the 2026 regular session by Senator Love and referred to the Judicial Proceedings committee. context
  • Restrictive housing, commonly known as solitary confinement, has been a subject of significant legislative scrutiny regarding inmate mental health and human rights standards in correctional facilities. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Incarcerated individuals in Maryland

Individuals in state correctional facilities gain strict time caps on restrictive housing, a ban on solitary confinement if categorized as vulnerable, and guaranteed daily out-of-cell hours.

Directly affected

Correctional facility managing officials

Facility administrators must alter housing protocols, ensure compliance with time limits and out-of-cell requirements, and submit mandatory reporting on restrictive housing placements.

Directly affected

Correctional Ombudsman

The Ombudsman is tasked with conducting implementation reviews, making unannounced facility visits, reviewing daily logs, administering surveys, and reporting findings in annual reports.

Key Facts

  • Restrictive housing is redefined from approximately 22 hours to 20 hours or more out of a 24-hour period in a locked room or cell.
  • Placement in restrictive housing is limited to a maximum of 15 consecutive days and no more than 20 total days in any 60-day period.
  • Individuals in restrictive housing must be offered at least 4 hours of out-of-cell time each day, including programming and medical or mental health treatment.
  • Vulnerable population members, including individuals under 22, those 55 and older, individuals with mental illnesses, developmental disabilities, or those who are pregnant, may not be placed in restrictive housing for any period of time.
Show all 7 facts
  • All restrictive housing units are required to create the least restrictive environment necessary for safety and security.
  • The Correctional Ombudsman must review the implementation status of the Act on or before October 1, 2028, and October 1, 2030, and include summaries in annual reports.
  • The Act takes effect on October 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the new time limit for restrictive housing under Senate Bill 908?
An individual may not be kept in for longer than 15 consecutive days and no more than 20 total days in any 60-day period.
Who is considered a member of a vulnerable population under the bill?
Vulnerable populations include individuals under 22 years old, individuals at least 55 years old, those with mental illness disabilities, history of psychiatric hospitalization, developmental disabilities, serious medical conditions, pregnant or postpartum individuals, individuals with significant auditory or visual impairments, and LGBTQI+ individuals.
How much out-of-cell time must be offered daily to someone in restrictive housing?
Individuals in must be offered at least 4 hours of time outside their cell each day, which includes programming and clinical treatment time.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026Senate
    Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m.
  2. Feb 6, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First Reading Judicial Proceedings

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Redefinition of Solitary Confinement Threshold

The bill lowers the threshold defining restrictive housing from approximately 22 hours to 20 hours or more per day in a locked cell.

Connected Entities

Judicial Proceedings, Sara Love, Commissioner of Pretrial Detention and Services and 2 more
OrganizationJudicial Proceedings“Senate committee assigned to review Senate Bill 908”Map →
PersonSara Love“Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 908”Map →
OrganizationCommissioner of Pretrial Detention and Services“Receives written reports regarding the placement of pregnant incarcerated indivi”Map →
OrganizationCommissioner of Correction“Receives written reports regarding the placement of pregnant incarcerated indivi”Map →
OrganizationCorrectional Ombudsman“Required to review implementation status on or before October 1, 2028, and Octob”Map →

Sources

Open source document

mgaleg.maryland.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance85
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record