POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri House Bill 1868 establishes class D misdemeanor for impeding, threatening, or harassing first responders

Original title: IMPEDING, THREATENING, OR HARASSING A FIRST RESPONDER

Last action · April 14, 2026: HCS Reported Do Pass (H)Sponsors: Lane Roberts and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Missouri House Bill 1868 establishes the new offense of impeding, threatening, or harassing a first responder as a for individuals who knowingly violate an oral warning to stay at least twenty-five feet away from a first responder engaged in official duties. The measure applies to anyone who ignores a warning and approaches or remains within the twenty-five foot boundary with the intent to interfere, threaten physical harm, or harass.

Why it matters

Creates criminal liability and penalties for civilians who breach a 25-foot safety buffer after receiving an oral warning from law enforcement, firefighters, parole officers, or s.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

First responders

Law enforcement officers, firefighters, parole or probation officers, and emergency medical care providers gain a legal 25-foot buffer zone when executing lawful duties after issuing an oral warning.

Directly affected

Civilians and members of the public

Individuals face potential class D misdemeanor criminal charges if they knowingly approach or remain within 25 feet of an active first responder after receiving an oral warning.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What distance must individuals maintain from a first responder after receiving a warning?
Individuals must not approach or remain within twenty-five feet of a first responder after receiving an oral warning not to approach.
What is the criminal penalty for violating this statute?
The offense of impeding, threatening, or harassing a first responder is classified as a .
Who qualifies as a first responder under this legislation?
First responders include law enforcement officers, parole or probation officers, firefighters, and s such as EMTs, paramedics, nurses, and designated hospital staff.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. Apr 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Reported Do Pass (H)
  2. Apr 14, 2026HouseCommittee
    HCS Voted Do Pass (H)
  3. Apr 14, 2026House
    Executive Session Completed (H)
  4. Apr 7, 2026House
    Public Hearing Completed (H)
  5. Mar 31, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Crime and Public Safety(H)
  6. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  2. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, George Hruza, General Assembly and 1 more
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House”Map →
PersonGeorge Hruza“Cosponsor for District 089”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body enacting the measure”Map →
PersonLane Roberts“Representative for District 161 introducing House Bill 1868”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record