POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas Requires Government Property Contracts to Allow Handgun License Holders

Original title: Relating to a required provision in certain governmental entity contracts regarding the carrying of handguns by license holders.

Last action · March 14, 2025: Referred to State AffairsSponsors: Briscoe Cain and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 1715 requires state and local government contracts for property use to explicitly prohibit contractors from banning handgun s from entering the property, effective September 1, 2025.

Background
  • State legislatures frequently regulate contract requirements and terms for agreements entered into by state agencies and local political subdivisions. context
  • Texas law establishes statutory frameworks governing where license holders are permitted to carry handguns, including specific references within the Texas Penal Code and Government Code. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Governmental entities

Must ensure that all contracts for the use of government-owned or leased property include the mandatory handgun provision.

Directly affected

Contractors using government property

Are prohibited from banning lawful handgun license holders from entering or remaining on the contracted property during the term of the agreement.

Directly affected

Handgun license holders

Retain the right to carry handguns on government-owned or leased property utilized by contractors, provided no other statutory prohibition applies.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which entities are required to include this clause in their contracts?
State agencies in the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, institutions of higher education, and local political subdivisions including counties, municipalities, and special-purpose districts.
Does this apply to existing government contracts already in effect before September 1, 2025?
No, it does not apply to contracts entered into before the effective date, unless those contracts are renewed, modified, or extended on or after September 1, 2025.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 14, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to State Affairs
  2. Mar 14, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Dec 30, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Standardization of Handgun Rules in Public Contracts

The bill establishes a standardized statewide contract clause prohibiting private or commercial entities operating on public property from restricting legal handgun carriers.

Connected Entities

Government Code, Penal Code, Education Code
OrganizationGovernment Code“Statutory code being amended to add Section 2252.911”Map →
OrganizationPenal Code“References sections 30.06, 30.07, and 46.03 regarding handgun communication and ”Map →
OrganizationEducation Code“Defines institutions of higher education under Section 61.003”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record